Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
> Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmm. Any chance we could persuade you otherwise?
> > I think that in order for Wine to succeed, it needs to
> > have consistent, strong packaging. I think in order for
> > that to happen, the packaging process needs to be
> > automated, and easily replicated.
>
> I strongly disagree with the automated part. You don't want anybody to
> do a 'make package' and put the package up for ftp; this is the most
> sure way of having tons of broken packages floating around.
I hadn't considered it that way. I concede the point.
(*again* <sigh> <g>).
