Hi,
It seems your latest wine deb packages are pretty nice. It's even
debconf enabled... Hmmm, nice. I'll have to look at debconf (<plug>for
prime-net</plug>) one day.
It's a shame I never use wine's .deb!
Ok, so just my 2 cents now.
Ove Kaaven wrote:
[...]
> Package: libwine-dev
> Depends: libwine
> Contains:
> usr/include/wine
>
> Package: wine-utils
> Contains:
> usr/bin: winedbg, winebuild, wmc, wrc, fnt2bdf
> usr/share/man: man pages for wmc and wrc
Wouldn't it be better if winebuild, wmc, wrc and their manpages (and
later winemaker) were in libwine-dev? After all they are all pretty much
required if you plan to develop WineLib applications. winedbg and
fnt2bdf OTOH have a legitimate use with just wine.
>
> Package: wine-doc
> Contains:
> usr/share/doc/wine-doc: SGML and HTML documentation, and the other
> small files (status/, psdrv.reg, and such)
I'm not sure I would put the SGML version of the documentation,
unless it's mandated by the Debian packaging guidelines.
See, I'm in favor of putting the SGML in the Wine CVS because
developpers should work on the source, and for the doc that is SGML. But
wine-doc is for users, not developpers, so we should give them
'binaries'. Here that would be HTML pages.
--
Francois Gouget
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
