On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:42:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > Or is the Wine code incorrect/fixable somehow ?
> > And does it make sense to stick with my current implementation anyway ?
> >
> > Or maybe we ought to modify SearchPath to return unix style paths ?
> >
> > Questions over questions...
> >
> > Andreas Mohr
> >
> I was hoping to report I didn't have a problem with it, but even if I
> set g: to be / (I wouldn't mind if it was a read-only filesystem...)
> the debugger can't find the debugee.
>
> FWIW, Wine is not windows, and nor should it be. (Try to drink windows,
> and you will get a sore throat, not the warm fuzzy feeling you were
> after). Wine can take a unix name in the command line; I don't see why
> this shouldn't apply to CreateProcess as well.
Valid point.
> I _think_ if we just don't mess with the command line the rest should be
> OK.
>
> Or we couuld change the debugger to be content with a dos style
> filename. :-/ I favor just leaving the command line alone.
It's simply not possible.
We *have* to mess with it.
Just go read the GetCommandLine docu if you don't believe it.
I guess I'll have to do some pretty ugly and/or time-consuming workarounds
then :-(
(in order to preserve a valid unix path)
Andreas Mohr
