On November 7, 2002 11:11 am, Vincent Béron wrote: > - Copying a global config if none exists in $HOME/.wine
Hm. Don't know what to think about this one. > - Add a destdir to Make.rules.in (for RPM build) I thought we don't need one. > - Some modifications to wineshelllink for RH specific things > - Bypass winesetup in winelauncher, copy default instead (RH doesn't > ship winesetup) > - Don't check for __libc_fork in configure.ac (to work on both glibc 2.2 > and 2.3?) Shouldn't we do something in the base distribution, so we don't require this hack? > - Add XSUB.h in winetest.c (fix 'my_perl unknown' error) Is this for the Perl test framework? I thought we'll get rid of it. > So, some of them I'll keep, and some not. Then there's where everything > is packaged. For that I'll follow what they have now, unless it's not > reasonable. Sounds good. However, if our packages are different from the 'official' RH ones, how are we going to name them? They should be named differently, right? Maybe -w1, -w2, etc. -- Dimi.
