Coolness. Thanks Michael! On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Michael Elman<[email protected]> wrote: > We're compliant! :) > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dims/Kevan, >> >> Thanks, so we'll wait for those that have access to the TCK to continue to >> open JIRAs and notify us when we're compliant. >> >> >> -Nick >> >> >> >> Nicholas Gallardo >> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development >> [email protected] >> Phone: 512-286-6258 >> Building: 903 / 5G-016 >> [image: Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>] >> Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> *Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>* >> >> 06/29/2009 08:30 AM >> Please respond to >> [email protected] >> >> >> To >> >> [email protected] >> cc >> >> >> Subject >> >> Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information >> >> Nick, >> >> No, it's not ok to disclose the # of failures. >> >> thanks, >> dims >> >> >> On 06/29/2009 08:48 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote: >> > Is it alright to disclose the result in a general way? As in, there are >> 32 >> > total failures for 500 tests? >> > >> > If so, can you give us a sense for where we are Michael? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > -Nick >> > >> > >> > >> > Nicholas Gallardo >> > WebSphere - REST& WebServices Development >> > [email protected] >> > Phone: 512-286-6258 >> > Building: 903 / 5G-016 >> > >> > >> > >> > Michael Elman >> > <[email protected] >> > > >> To >> > [email protected] >> > 06/28/2009 11:52 >> cc >> > PM >> > >> Subject >> > Re: [DISCUSS] TCK Information >> > Please respond to >> > wink-...@incubato >> > r.apache.org >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi Kevan, >> > >> > It's my fault. I thought it's ok to post the test names, but now I read >> the >> > NDA again and it seems that you are absolutely right and nothing >> regarding >> > the TCK should be exposed publicly. >> > I'll edit the JIRA now to ensure it doesn't appear anymore, but it was >> > already sent to the mailing list... Ouch :( >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Kevan Miller >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> All, >> >> There needs to be a discussion about how TCK information is discussed on >> >> this mailing list. I haven't looked at the JAX-RS TCK. However, If you >> > are >> >> accessing the TCK via Apache's agreement with Sun, you submitted the >> >> following NDA to Apache: http://www.apache.org/jcp/ApacheNDA.pdf Most >> >> projects treat this as restricting their ability to explicitly specifics >> >> about the TCK tests (e.g. test names, functions tested, etc). Perhaps >> the >> >> JAX-RS TCK is available publicly, not under different terms? There is >> > some >> >> debate about how closed projects need to be about TCK results. >> >> >> >> FYI, here's information about Apache and the JCP (including TCK >> testing): >> >> http://www.apache.org/jcp/ >> >> >> >> --kevan >> >> >> > >> >> >
-- - Bryant Luk
