+1 to graduate wink into a TLP. As a light-weight JAX-RS runtime, I see good potential of this project. Even though the development activity is low but we observe active user questions.
AFAIK, the PMC consists of developers from different employers. Once we graduate, we can probably attract more people to the project by implementing the upcoming JAX-RS 2.0 spec :-) Thanks, Raymond On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In previous graduation discussions, I've heard two concerns: diversity and >> project committment (is the project interested in implementing future >> specs, etc). >> >> We have several possibilities: >> >> graduate as a TLP >> graduate as a sub-project >> wait a little bit longer >> retire >> >> We have several projects that are consuming Wink. They might be interested >> in accepting Wink as a sub-project. This is not an ideal outcome, IMO. I'd >> prefer to see a TLP. However, I think it's better than seeing the project >> retire. >> >> Comments? >> >> --kevan > > > > I completely agree with what Dave Fisher mentioned on his previous > Wink assessment [1]. Wink is a mature project with various PPMC members > that are experienced Apache people. Also, I don't see any benefit for the > project to really stay as an incubator project for any longer as the > IP clearance is done, there has been tons of releases, and we are welcoming > and know how to get new people into the project. My personal opinion is to > move on with graduation for wink as a new TLP. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg34955.html > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
