+1 to graduate -- dims
On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to graduate wink into a TLP. As a light-weight JAX-RS runtime, I see good > potential of this project. Even though the development activity is low but we > observe active user questions. > > AFAIK, the PMC consists of developers from different employers. > > Once we graduate, we can probably attract more people to the project by > implementing the upcoming JAX-RS 2.0 spec :-) > > Thanks, > Raymond > > On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> In previous graduation discussions, I've heard two concerns: diversity and >>> project committment (is the project interested in implementing future >>> specs, etc). >>> >>> We have several possibilities: >>> >>> graduate as a TLP >>> graduate as a sub-project >>> wait a little bit longer >>> retire >>> >>> We have several projects that are consuming Wink. They might be interested >>> in accepting Wink as a sub-project. This is not an ideal outcome, IMO. I'd >>> prefer to see a TLP. However, I think it's better than seeing the project >>> retire. >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> --kevan >> >> >> >> I completely agree with what Dave Fisher mentioned on his previous >> Wink assessment [1]. Wink is a mature project with various PPMC members >> that are experienced Apache people. Also, I don't see any benefit for the >> project to really stay as an incubator project for any longer as the >> IP clearance is done, there has been tons of releases, and we are welcoming >> and know how to get new people into the project. My personal opinion is to >> move on with graduation for wink as a new TLP. >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg34955.html >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
