[Winona Online Democracy]

An off line question was asked about excessive pay for corporate heads and a
freeze for them ---

Leaders, lead by example and the idea of those leading setting an example
Would be good.  Instead of a freeze excessive corporate salaries should
be rolled back 5-10 % resulting in higher income taxes being paid by
their employing corporations.

Increased corporate profits should increase dividends for pension fund
investors, individual investor dividend income and should also increases
the value of their stock.  While the tax collections may not yield
increases (the corporate executive goes down, the corporation taxes go
up, the pension fund is exempt and the increase stock value yields
nothing until sold).

The leadership model they would provide would reinforce the idea that
controlling
cost is as important and sometimes more important than as increasing
sales or taxes.  The reward for their co-workers is stable employment as
well as
providing their boss, the owners(stockholders) with a return on the
capital that exceeds the risk afforded by parking their investments in
Government Bonds, Bank CD's or stuffing it under the mattress.

Paul Double
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________

>A.    How much money would be saved by each local unit of government if a
>salary freeze were implemented by the state for one year?
>
>B.    If my memory serves me right, each one percent represents in WAPS
>about $160,000
>       Assuming state aide to K-12 education stays the same what would that
>do the cash balances on hand one year later?
>
>C.   Also the same question is asked for WSU and SE Technical and if frozen
>would there be any need for tuition increases?
>
>
>Paul Double
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

__________________________________________________________________
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now!
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/

_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to