|
I've
been asked who should pay for health insurance if it's not the employer. Dwayne
and Phil both are convinced it should be a government run single payer system.
Their arguments are convincing to me. I would support such a system. However,
I'm not convinced that you can bring such a system to reality. In my opinion,
Americans (for good or bad) are loath to put the federal government in charge of
aspects of their day to day life. Imagine for a moment, you call the IRS for a
health insurance question. I know it's not a fair analogy, but it is the way
some people think (again, this is my opinion).
While
I'm breaking the rule that says you should never write a letter like this late
at night (I'm never as clever and witty as I think I am) I'm going to give it a
shot.
Assuming Dwayne and Phil are unsuccessful at bringing about a move to a
national health care system I would propose the following:
1)
Think only in terms of the State of Minnesota
2)
Think in terms of making Insurance Companies play by rules that would 'mimic the
rules we would use in a single payer system'.
What
does this mean?
Well,
besides the evil profit motive of insurance companies (sarcasm intended since
I'm sensitive to the word profit being equated with evil) there are a few things
that strike me as reasonable reasons that health insurance premiums vary
significantly from person to person or business to business.
1)
Pools and Cherry Picking: If you're a small employer with one or two employees
with significant health issues, your premiums are going to be different from
employers who have huge numbers of employees and 'on average' aren't as high a
risk factor. Throw in the fact that self-insured people who have little in the
way of 'health issues' are able to get insurance much more easily (or less
expensively) than an individual who is seeking insurance but has a history of
health problems.
2)
Many healthy people are not in the insurance pools. I would suspect this happens
because of two primary reasons.
2a) I'm young and healthy and I have better things to spend
my money on.
-or-
2b) I'm wealthy enough that I don't need
insurance.
How
would I 'regulate' insurance companies to deal with this?
1)
First and foremost, I would eliminate the issue of 'which pool are you in'?. If
I was King for a day and could decree only one absolute law, it would be that
insurance companies had to look at Minnesota as one and only one pool. If you
are a resident of Minnesota, you are a member of that pool. Add to that the
requirement that you could NOT be denied insurance because of a pre-existing
condition. If you live in Minnesota, you can get insurance and it doesn't matter
where you work or what your health history is.
2)This
is going to be the part that will kill my plan but, .... treat health insurance
in the same way we treat auto insurance. If you have an auto, you are required
by law to have insurance. In my opinion, if you have a 'body and you're alive'
you should be required to have health insurance. This will keep all the people
that think they can stay out of the equation while they are young and healthy
(or wealthy enough to avoid insurance) from diluting the pool of healthy
individuals.
Please
note that neither of the above points preclude insurance being provided by your
employer. While I'd rather not pretend that it makes sense for me to
be an integral part of the health care system, at least level the playing
field.
Oh, if
it isn't already obvious, the state of Minnesota would have to play a role in
providing the health insurance premiums for those who could not afford them.
And, the state of Minnesota may have to address the 'Minimum Wage Laws' if we
expect people to buy their own insurance. Of coarse, if people would prefer, we
can continue to require businesses to provide this benefit. I'm expecting
then that the day will come where I'll be required to buy my employees their
groceries.
So
much for my late night dissertations. Good night all.
Rich
Pflughoeft
|
- [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Paul Double
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Rich PFlughoeft
- Re: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Rich PFlughoeft
- Re: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Duane M. Peterson
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Dwayne Voegeli
- Re: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Robert P Kaldunski
- Re: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Cherisa Templeton
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies terri hyle
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Phil Carlson
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies terri hyle
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Dwayne Voegeli
- RE: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Phil Carlson
- FW: [Winona] It's the Insurance Companies Paul Double
