Bob and Others,

The ability of banks to sell insurance comes from a 1996 U.S.Supreme Court
Ruling that allows Nationally-Chartered Banks to Sell Insurance from Small
Towns Even When State Law Purports to Prohibit it.  A Link on the Barnett
decision
http://baltimore.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/1996/11/11/newscolumn5.ht
ml

The ruling goes on to say Section 92 of the National Bank Act authorized
small-town (less than 5000) to sell insurance to "persons outside of those
towns"
More links follow
http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/1997/03/03/story3.html

http://baltimore.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/1996/11/11/newscolumn5.ht
ml
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2901496,00.html

To be continued------


Paul Double

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bob Sebo
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:16 PM

Paul crafts his arguments well when discussing this medicharge
proposal...but I don't think that we change the world quite that easily. And
while he suggests that a consumer (Winona) could create a model...I think he
is wrong.

He is right, I believe, that providers are sick and tired of
insurance-as-we-know-it.  How such a system would protect "them from
litigation of price fixing, market collusion and treble damages," I don't
quite see.  I am also surprised that another of his 'predictions' has not
come true...that of the entry of the Wells Fargos of this world into
insurance, or at least into funding health care.  Are the old 1930's bank
laws still too strict too allow for it?  Must be...the wall into investing
has been broken, but not apparently insurance.

His contention that the federal and state governments could work within this
framework, I think, is entirely right.  It could all work...he is
right...but it won't because the insurance providers are too influential.
What would their role be?  Do you know how many people work in that
industry?  Do you know how much money these people have?  We're talking
revolutionary change.

Which is why I've always adovated for single payer...not that I believe in
it (I opt to pay more for what I consider better coverage)...but that it's
enough to scare the health insurance industry into sitting down at the table
and start talking (shock and awe).  That's the only way reform will
occur...with them, not against them.

Bob Sebo
Winona

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to