[Winona Online Democracy]

I don't believe jails work to  rehabilitate or deter.  They do protect us
from the criminal.  Most people in jail now are not there to protect us.
Some who we need to be protected from are released.  I don't pretend to have
a solution.  But first we have to understand the problem and our own
motivations.  Judge Peterson said we don't want to pay for prisons.  I
disagree.  We, as a society, do want to pay for prisons to keep the riff
raff out of sight and out of mind.  It doesn't really matter that it does
nothing to reduce crime.
We need to reduce the incentives to keep the Courts busy, the attorneys busy
and the jails full.  We are afraid we might lose a Judge position if the
cases going to Court go down, we want to justify the number of attorneys
prosecuting and the number providing public defense, the State Dept. of
Corrections likes prisons, the Sheriffs each want their own jail in each
county so it can be run by them and not share.  These incentives all cost
too much and push the system in a direction that exacerbates the problem of
not being able to reduce crime.
Community based treatment, prevention, early intervention, deterrence,
diversion, treat mental illness, treat chemical dependency, electronic
monitoring, restorative justice are all examples.  I don't pretend to know
all the possibilities.  We need incentives to use such methods and not the
disincentives than now exist.  I do know the simple one that makes us all
more comfortable is jail and it does not work and it costs too much -
especially in the long run.  A few simple ideas -- law enforcement should
get credit for the diversions they do and not just the arrests; same for
prosecutors in terms of going to court vs. diversion methods; Courts could
get credit for such things as diversion being counted in the 'caseload' used
to determine how many judges a county gets;  money could be diverted to
treatment from jails; the state could fund community based services at a
higher rate than jails; etc.
Pogo went into the world to look for the enemy and found that it was "us".
I think that is the case here.  "Out of sight, out of mind" works for me -- 
I just wish someone else would pay for it.

Craig Brooks


_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to