Yessir- so noted, and highlighted in TAC case notes as it's just too
precise and repetitive to not have meaning. 

Lee 

-----Original Message-----
From: Max Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:21 AM
To: Lee H Badman; The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group
Listserv
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multiple RADIUS accounting "starts" for same
client

One thing we noticed but didn't mention because we had no idea what it
means or how it could be related, is that when the 5 starts come
through, they are exactly 7 seconds apart, which sounds like a timeout,
resend, reset kinda thing.  But we couldn't see why.

________________________________

From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/13/2008 10:04 AM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Cc: Max Garcia; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multiple RADIUS accounting "starts" for same
client


Curious. To back up, this is meaningful to us not just as a curiosity,
but we are using the accounting starts as a trigger to a process, and
the multiple successive starts are causing a bit of noise pollution.
 
I started reviewing the RADIUS Accounting RFP:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2866.txt
 
Some nuggets I get from this (and would welcome someone who smarter on
this to correct me)-
 
-          It seems that any "service" started and stopped for a client-
like perhaps outer/inner auth mechanisms- should each have their own
start and stop. Perhaps this explains some of the seeming duplicates?
-          These services have an accounting field, but all I see are
two dots- like some service is generating a start or stop, but can't be
identified in our ACS (if we could see named services), it might help
shed light
-          There is the concept of multi-linked sessions, where each
link has a start and eventual stop, but I have no idea if this could be
relevant in this case- I just enabled the field for multi-links and will
see if this starts to populate
 
So I can start to get a very  fuzzy picture of "OK, maybe multiple
starts and stops for the same client in RADIUS accounting might be
explained". But the fact that the Framed IP Address is off on another
network/VLAN and "foreign" controllers are being named as NAS on some of
these records has me thinking that perhaps there is LWAPP voodoo
afoot... (maybe).
 
No theories back from TAC yet.
 
 
 
Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003
________________________________

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:48 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multiple RADIUS accounting "starts" for same
client
 
 
We do run PEAP w/MS-CHAPv2. We support all supplicants. And we so see
the issue on both Windows and Macs. I've checked one or two Linux users
and so far they look consistent.
 
Hector
 
 
 
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:16 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multiple RADIUS accounting "starts" for same
client
 
Hector (and Stephen) -
 
Are you both running PEAP w/ MS-CHAP v2? And do you force the use of any
one supplicant (like Windows. Or Odyssey?)  And for what it's worth I'm
seeing this on Windows and Mac- but not all clients.
 
Lee
________________________________

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:47 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multiple RADIUS accounting "starts" for same
client
 
Lee, 
 
Just to let you know, we are running version 4.1 and have seen the same
thing. I'd be interested to hear what TAC has to say.
 
Hector
Louisiana State University
 
 
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:09 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Multiple RADIUS accounting "starts" for same
client
 
Here's a weird one- wondering if anyone else may have experienced the
same using LWAPP, WiSMs, 802.1x, and Cisco ACS.
 
RADIUS Accounting log sample:
            
 
 
 
 
Client Calling ID
 
 
 
Framed IP Address
 
Controller 
 
 
 
 
 
6/10/2008
10:43:03
User1
Default Group
128.230.190.150
Start
484e92f6/00:17:f2:ef:21:a8/480066
 
128.230.85.69
29
10.21.0.21
 
6/10/2008
10:43:10
User1
Default Group
128.230.190.150
Start
484e92f6/00:17:f2:ef:21:a8/480066
 
128.230.193.201
29
10.21.0.21
 
6/10/2008
10:43:17
User1
Default Group
128.230.190.150
Start
484e92f6/00:17:f2:ef:21:a8/480066
 
128.230.106.64
29
10.21.0.43
 
6/10/2008
10:43:24
User1
Default Group
128.230.190.150
Start
484e92f6/00:17:f2:ef:21:a8/480066
 
128.230.45.246
29
10.21.0.41
 
6/10/2008
10:43:31
User1
Default Group
128.230.190.150
Start
484e92f6/00:17:f2:ef:21:a8/480066
 
128.230.195.59
29
10.21.0.23
 
6/10/2008
10:43:38
User1
Default Group
128.230.190.150
Start
484e92f6/00:17:f2:ef:21:a8/480066
 
128.230.149.78
29
10.21.0.29
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Single user, multiple RADIUS starts reported, seven seconds apart. User
IP (client calling ID) not matching Framed IP Address- and controllers
that have APs that can't possibly be within client earshot all claiming
to forward the RADIUS logging...
 
If you look at the end column, it shows what controller is sending the
RADIUS start. In this case, 6 different controllers are sending a
"start".  In the framed IP address column, there is no real-world
indication that those addresses are being used in any shape or form- and
many of them are on a different network than the user address in the
Client Calling ID space. Sorta feels like corrupt data being reported.
 
We are seeing this frequently enough to be noteworthy- but clients are
sailing through the authentication process with absolutely no trouble or
signs of behind-the scenes weirdness. Have opened a TAC case- but
thought I'd float this to the group. (I can't tie this to any of the
150+ open caveats on the WiSMs).

Thanks-
 
 
Lee 
 
 
Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003
 
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and
subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion
list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to