Lee,

You may want to disable CDP on the AP ports, in case there's a pre-af conflict.

Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare 
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | [email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of Lee H
Badman
Sent: Thu 3/19/2009 10:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Have to lie to LWAPP APs about power injectors?
 
So far, I'm seeing 1130s act weird on 3524-PWR-XL switches, but I think there
are other combinations as well. Thanks for the info, though.

Lee
________________________________
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Legge, Jeffry
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Have to lie to LWAPP APs about power injectors?

Lee, I have seen Poe power problems when installing 1250's on 3750E switches. If
you use the command  "power inline port maximum 20000" on the port then the port
will get the maximum power and none of the radios will shut down.... My two
cents. -Jeff Legge Radford University.

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Have to lie to LWAPP APs about power injectors?

Wondering if anyone else experiences this. I'm working now to see if it is
isolated to a single Catalyst switch or if it is more widespread. Frequently, we
will get a report that a radio on an LWAPP AP is down. Sometimes the alarm is
for insufficient drawn power, sometimes not- just radio down. Better than 90% of
the time, a simple AP reboot will not do any good- we have to lie to the
controller that the AP has a PoE injector installed, even though the AP is on a
switch. Usually the condition is onesy-twoesy- not every AP on a given switch
(although this morning we saw that) and often happens on APs that are obviously
not taxing a given switch's available PoE output.

I am opening a case as we see this enough to be of concern, but also am
wondering if anyone else has experienced this in a given environment where LWAPP
APs are powered by Cisco PoE switches?

Thanks-

Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to