Hi Vikki

We have used interface groups for a while with great success on our WiSM2. We 
have a DHCP lease time of 20mins and we have an interface group that consist of 
20 x /15 private IP subnets so that we have the IP capacity to cope.

Thanks

Bryn


Bryn Jones
ISS Network Development
Rm 8.01e Computing Block
EC Stoner Building
University of Leeds
UK
LS2 9JT

0113 343 7055


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vikki Cutrone
Sent: 15 February 2013 19:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless Interface Groups

Hello All,

I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface group on 
my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well as increase the 
IP address space.  It seems to be working but DHCP addresses are still being 
consumed at an alarming rate.  Is anyone else using the interface group 
feature? and if so is it working as expected?

Thank you in advance!

--
Vikki Cutrone
Network Administrator
Vassar College, Box 13
124 Raymond Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604-0013

845-437-7231
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to