Yes, I think there's a mistaken impression about the Aerohives and Merakis
out there. Some of it is FUD from the big iron vendors. Some of it is
old-timers like me questioning the over-hyped magic cloud.

The stuff works. Anyone looking to move off their current solution should
take a look. It's not perfect, but neither is the establishment.

Rand

P.S. A little de-FUD if you want it: http://www.meraki.com/trust/#oob




Rand

Rand P. Hall
Director, Network Services                 askIT!
Merrimack College
978-837-3532
[email protected]

If I had an hour to save the world, I would spend 59 minutes defining the
problem and one minute finding solutions. – Einstein


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Hurt,Trenton W.
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  With the aerohive solution this is done thru cooperative control amongst
> the aps that are RF neighbors with each other.  Here is article that
> discusses the protocols that aerohive uses to accomplish this.****
>
>
>
> http://blogs.aerohive.com/blog/wi-fi-that-wont-die/cooperative-control-part-3
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Watters, John
> *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2013 11:55 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick
> debate revisited****
>
>  ** **
>
> ** **
>
> What happens to client roaming, RF balancing, and channel selection
> without a controller-based architecture?****
>
> ** **
>
> If you use the Aruba Airwave AMP management platform, it should be able to
> keep your autonomous APs in sync.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -jcw
> [image: cid:[email protected]]****
>
> ** **
>
> *
> *
>
> John Watters                           The University of Alabama****
>
>                                                 Office of Information
> Technology****
>
>                                                 205-348-3992****
>
>  ****
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
> *On Behalf Of *Tim Cappalli
> *Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2013 10:50 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick
> debate revisited****
>
> ** **
>
> What types of controller issues are you seeing that you hope to be fixed
> with a controller-less architecture?****
>
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Tim Cappalli*, *Network Engineer
> LTS | Brandeis University
> x67149 | (617) 701-7149
> [email protected]****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Barros, Jacob <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> Hello all.  We are seriously considering replacing our Aruba
> infrastructure in favor of a distributed model.  We are having controller
> issues this academic year and the appeal of a controller-less model is
> strong. ****
>
> ** **
>
> It feels like I am coming full circle to where I was six years ago.
>  Though I know its not exactly the same, I went back to the thin vs thick
> debates in the archives.  A few things stood out to me as considerations:
>  One concern was vendor longevity.  Another was whether or not the thick AP
> model would be able to keep up with the controller based architecture.  An
> advantage of the controller based architecture that stood out to me was
> central processing, specifically regarding key exchange.****
>
> ** **
>
> Are these points still valid concerns?  If your administration asked you
> to consider a distributed architecture, what other (vendor-neutral)
> concerns would you have?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks, in advance, for your opinions!****
>
> ** **
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Jake Barros  |  Network Administrator  |  Office of Information Technology
> ****
>
> Grace College and Seminary  |  Winona Lake, IN  |  574.372.5100 x6178****
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ****
>
> ** **
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** **
>
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ** **
>  ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>
>

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to