I suspect the clause will still be valid, but we cannot use wireless countermeasures to enforce them. Telling students to turn them off, disabling wired ports, student discipline, etc are outside the FCC's jurisdiction it seems to me.
Thomas Carter Network and Operations Manager Austin College 903-813-2564 [cid:[email protected]] From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Helman Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] It would seem FCC just declared WLAN quarantine features illegal I just saw this on CNN and jumped on the list to post. Using your own AP is against the AUP everyone signs at our institution. Now I wonder if that clause is invalid. -Brian Sent from my Galaxy S4. Tiny keyboards=typing mistakes. Verify anything sent. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Sweetser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] It would seem FCC just declared WLAN quarantine features illegal I think a good chunk of the use is even more insidious than that. I've been in a position where I've offered university guests access to our wifi. A number of these users - smart, highly technical IT professionals - instead just said "Nah, I'll just use my hotspot." I suspect it's a combination of two things. First, "I paid for it, so I have to use it to get my money's worth". Second, "I'd have to think about how to set up a new wifi, or I can just turn on my hotspot by rote memory." In both cases, the cost (or lack thereof) and quality of any host offered wifi doesn't even factor into the decision at all. Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu<http://wpi.edu> | For every problem, there is a solution that Manager of Network Operations | is simple, elegant, and wrong. Worcester Polytechnic Institute | - HL Mencken On 10/3/2014 3:21 PM, Philippe Hanset wrote: > Everything would be so much simpler if locations would provide Wi-Fi for free > or at a reasonable price. > When a technology is used by everyone (e.g. Electricity) like Wi-Fi, just > include it in the cost of doing business. > Stop charging users for Wi-Fi, especially when the room is already at > $200+/night. People will bring their own Mi-Fi or smartphone-hotspot, > and bypass the silly cost model! > > At Educause this week the Vendor-floor was plagued with hundreds of Mi-Fi and > private Wi-Fi. > The event was charging upward of $150/day for Wi-Fi to exhibitors. So, many of > them had their own solutions! > > Humans are resourceful...and if you piss them off they will read the law and > call the FCC (or they pirate your network ;-) > > Philippe > > Philippe Hanset > www.eduroam.us<http://www.eduroam.us> <http://www.eduroam.us> > > > > On Oct 3, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Lee H Badman > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > >> >> What do you all think of this? >> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/after-blocking-personal-hotspot-at-hotel-marriott-to-pay-fcc-600000/ >> >> - Lee Badman > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.<http://www.educause.edu/groups/> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
