WOW, someone who has views similar to my own and its not just some random user, its Jim Thompson!
I guess my opinions are not really that far out. For a while it felt like it, I was starting to think that my understanding of the rules were flawed so much that my comprehension of the english language must be somewhere around the 2nd grade level. So, in english, what am I saying? I agree with Jim. :-) I believe Tim's interpretation of the rules is a "little" different, but "for the most part", I agree with Tim too. :-) Judd Jim Thompson wrote: > I would love to see some comment from Tim Pozar on this issue. > > I am not Tim Pozar, but I play him on TV. (Where is that wig?) > > If one complies with the FCC rules and ones bridge does not exceed the FCC > limits does this setup need to be certified? > > According to the rules, yes. > > linksys is now selling amps and antennas Do they get certification on a > particular configuration or is each > Site individually certified? > > Configuration. Amps are a special case, btw. > > I take from your answer the Paperwork is the difference and the performance > is not substantially different? > > Testing and submission are the difference. > > If you don't put an amp on it, however, it is unlikely that the FCC cares much. (My > opinion.) The FCC doesn't > care much about antenna gain (again my opinion), since they know that all other > things being equal, increased > gain brings decreased coverage, and with decreased coverage comes less > 'interference'. > > As a reminder, part 15 says, "thou shalt not cause harmful interference, and thou > shalt accept all > interference without complaint." > > So (again, in my opinion), the FCC won't be 'shutting down' anything that is a > combination of a WAP11 with a different > antenna attached. Amps, again, are very, very different. Offer a bridge with > associate antenna for sale, and, again, > big difference. (See: commerce clause, US Constitution) > > Obviously my opinions don't necessarily represent those of my employer. <--- what > is this, usenet? > > Jim > > Enrique > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Sensney > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [BAWUG] 802.11 to T1 (Jeff Johnson) > > FCC certification. Well worth the $1900 if the FCC comes knocking at your > door. An uncertified system will be shut down on the spot. > > At 07:44 PM 3/4/2003, Enrique LaRoche wrote: > > >How does your Product compare with a Bridge made from some of the low cost > >802.11a or g products. > >I imagine a pair of Linksys 802.11a Waps configured for point to point > >would > >offer a theoretical 54 mbps. > >At a cost less than $500.00 what do I get from your company worth the > >extra > >$1900.00? > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:04 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [BAWUG] 802.11 to T1 (Jeff Johnson) > > > > > >Jeff, > > > >We manufacture a 802.11a wireless outdoor bridge > >30mbps. Cost is about $2400 retail per link (Radio, > >Antenna, cables). We have partner with a company > >called to provide T1 services over our radio: > > > >Engage Communication, Inc. > >9053 Soquel Drive > >Aptos, CA USA 95003 > >Telephone: (408) 688-1021 > >Fax: (408) 688-1421 > > > >The important thing to remember when using voice T1 is > >QOS is very important. In working with Engage we have > >given priority to the voice (T1) traffic with our > >radio. What ever bandwidth is left over after the > >voice traffic is used for data traffic. Please give me > >a call if you'd like more details. > > > > > >Sincerely, > > > >Rich Costa Toll Free: 866-2AIRAYA > >AIRAYA CORP 866-224-7292 > >637 Adair Court Mobile: 650-302-7286 > >Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Int'l: 408-776-9583 > > > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Web: http://www.airaya.com > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > >http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > >-- > >general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > >[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > >-- > >general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > >[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
