Jim Thompson wrote: > WOW, someone who has views similar to my own and its not just some random > user, its Jim Thompson! > > What's so special about Jim Thompson? Seems like a clueless newbie to me. Several > of his former friends think he > is a back-stabbing asshole.
Again, sounds like we have much in common. I'm a clueless newbie and I have no friends. > I believe Tim's interpretation of the rules is a "little" different, but > "for the most part", I agree with Tim too. :-) > > Tim's interpretation is a 'strict' reading of the rules, and is highly applicable in > broadcast engineering. > (Several of us can quote chapter and verse.) > > I spent the weekend with several of the heads @ OET (FCC), btw. You might want to > take away that I have > an ... informed opinion. It would seem that the FCC loves Wi-Fi, and will move to > enhance, not detract > from, its success. Well, you are the second person, besides Patrick, who confirmed this point of having an "informed opinion". Even Patrick noted that the FCC is likely to enhance Wi-Fi and not do anything to potentially slow it down, this after I don't know how many years that he was preaching just the opposite (IMHO, he was just trying to sell more of his own stuff, i.e. he was biased (prolly still is, but like I said, I have no friends, so I never hear from him anymore.)). Jim, I need some stuff that you have access to, drop me a note offlist. Seems you never have time to respond (or maybe my spam filters bounce your mail on accident) when I shoot you a message offlist. :-) Judd -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
