yes, I meant b...hmm...wonder why nobody got my second e-mail follow up which I correct myself...and I am talking about the future when g does become finalized...
Tyler -----Original Message----- From: Gene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Current 802.11 market you mean backward compatible to b (obviously, something will be "backward compatible" to itself). Anyways, g isn't finalized yet and there seems to be some issues with cross-manufacturer/chipset/etc. compatibility among g devices. For the time being, stick with a+b (a uses a less crowded band so it might be better for those who just seem to not be able to get b to work reliably). G. Tyler Chao wrote: > 802.11g does not interoperate with a. It is backwards compatible to g. The > wave of the future is probably the dual band a+g cards because it works with > both the 2.4 and 5 ghz frequencies and incorporates all 3 standards (well g > is not finalized yet) ;). > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lile Elam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 2:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Current 802.11 market > > > Well I could be wrong but I was under the impression that 802.11g > could interoperate with a and b. > > Prehaps I need to go read the specs... > > -lile > > hacker artist > GeekMaids.Com - Creating Order out of Chaos... Cleaning and Beyond! > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
