I'm sure IBM also had plenty of Phd types who documented why their drive would work as they claimed it would, before IBM invested a cent in the prototype.
Never said they didn't.
BTW, it is always best to cite the source of your facts so folks can verify
them. In this case the issue of Byte magazine might be useful.
I would if I could. But I no longer have my old Byte magazines. The wife factor.
I suspect we
will find you were comparing apples to oranges, at least with regards to the
specific hard drive technologies.
Let's try again. We'll skip IBM since you seem to miss the point I was making.
This PhD said we wouldn't see hard drives much larger than 2 GB in size. He had all sorts of theory and charts to back up what he said.
-- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
