Tim: By and large I think this is a good thing, and kind of a no brainer for the hobbyists.
My concern is the WISP's.... I'd like to see a little accountability, and I feel so much better about it if someone with some sort of license (ham, commercial?) signed off on the install. Any thoughts? -- Jeff King, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/13/2003 On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:47:17 -0700, Tim Pozar wrote: >Sounds promising. I was back in DC a couple of months ago and one >of the FCC folks asked what they could do for us. I suggested they >change certification to get rid of the "system" concept. Equipement >can be certified by themselves. Transmitters, amps, etc and it >would be the responsiblity of the user to not combine all to exceed >15.247 and 15.407. The current rules do not help development like >what BARWN and SFLAN is doing. > >Tim > >On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:39:14PM -0700, Tom Cokenias wrote: >>The actual text of the proposed rule making will come out next >>week, but from the public notice seems it would interest many in >>the group: >> >>FCC PROPOSES CHANGES IN TECHNICAL REGULATIONS FOR UNLICENSED >>DEVICES TO FACILITATE DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED TECHNOLGIES AND TO >>STREAMLINE REGULATIONS TO INCREASE FLEXIBILITY > -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
