On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:54:12PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My hunch is that it was simpler and cheaper for senao to make a +23dBm card > with a so-so receiver than a +20dBm card with a great receiver - besides, > marketing will LOVE being able to say "twice as much POWER" - when was the > last time you heard a marketing hype "6 dB better code to noise ratio!"??
Indeed. I have a related question on this front: Can anyone speak to *antenna connector cycling*? What sort of antenna connector on a PCMCIA 11b card is the sturdiest: I can forsee cycling that connector *a lot*. (4-10 times a *day*, in some cases) Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
