On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:46:58PM -0400, Brian Lloyd wrote: > > TNC's are a pain to mate, though. Gotta have threads, do I? > > No. I happen to like SMA because the are compact and easy to thread on and off. If > you want something fast, use BNC. That doesn't pose much of an impedance bump at > 2.4 gigs.
Ok. I wasn't sure I could get away with that. 50ohm BNC's, or 75's? > >> Fasten the pigtail to the card really well and just > >>connect and disconnect from the TNC connector. It's a little bulky but > >>will at least last. > > > > By "really well", do we mean "expoxt the entire pigtail including the TNC > > jack to the case, like an ethernet lump"? :-) > > Sounds about right. Even a ty-wrap will help a lot. Got it. Here's another stupid question: how much pain will I endure trying to use a 2.4GHz magmount (for 802.11) with a CDMA 1xRTT card (at 1.9GHz)? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 OS X: Because making Unix user-friendly was easier than debugging Windows -- Simon Slavin, on a.f.c -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
