On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 01:57:00 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: > senza tinc la configurazione rimane uguale ma il traffico al posto di > passare dal tunnel via internet passa solo attraverso i link wireless
scusa e come fai a confrontare i due valori se li fai passare da infrastrutture diverse? on puoi fare un test fra gli stessi endpoint peròpassando attraverso internet? se i due si ragigungono per connettersi con tinc potranno anche raggiungersi per far connettere iperf, no? > > Il 03 luglio 2011 13:51, Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 01:48:37 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: > >> il test e' sempre PC( iperf -c ) <-- cavo lan --> Piconstation ( > >> btman-adv + tinc )<-- tinc ---> PC( batman-adv + tinc + iperf -s) > > > > anche senza TINC la configurazione rimane uguale? scusa ma non ho capito > > questo daalle mail precedenti > > > >> > >> >usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo > >> >deviati.. > >> > >> quei test non sono fatti in parallelo sono fatti in modo sequenziale > >> quindi volta per volta c'e' ne e' attivo solo uno > >> > >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:40, Darkman <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> > Magari se scegliessi un test "unico" sarebbe anche meglio, > >> > usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo > >> > deviati.. > >> > Se non mi dicessi della CPU a palla, guardando sta roba ti direi che è > >> > congestione.. > >> > > >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:31, Gioacchino Mazzurco > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > ha scritto: > >> >> > >> >> altra serie di test > >> >> > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.8 sec 384 KBytes 167 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.5 sec 384 KBytes 180 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 384 KBytes 157 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.1 sec 384 KBytes 149 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-32.3 sec 384 KBytes 97.3 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.8 sec 384 KBytes 151 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-27.7 sec 256 KBytes 75.8 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.8 sec 256 KBytes 96.3 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.3 sec 512 KBytes 294 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.0 sec 512 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-37.6 sec 512 KBytes 112 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.7 sec 512 KBytes 224 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.3 sec 384 KBytes 148 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.9 sec 640 KBytes 293 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-24.8 sec 512 KBytes 169 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-16.4 sec 384 KBytes 192 Kbits/sec > >> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.4 sec 384 KBytes 147 Kbits/sec > >> >> > >> >> ho spento dnsmasq che non serviva a niente e andiamo di poco ma meglio > >> >> > >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:16, Darkman <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> >> > Il sintomo è abbastanza chiaro, ma dubito sia colpa della CPU o > >> >> > meglio, > >> >> > secondo me qualcosa > >> >> > è stata scritta male, 100Kbps sono davvero ridicoli. A maggior ragione > >> >> > quando ste cpu hanno anche qualche set dedicato > >> >> > alla crittografia simmetrica... > >> >> > > >> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:04, Gioacchino Mazzurco > >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> > ha scritto: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ma il problema sembra proprio l'eccessivo utilizzo di cpu per la vpn > >> >> >> perche' stando in ssh sulla picostation mentre c'e' traffico che > >> >> >> passa > >> >> >> sulla vpn diventa completamente unresponsive non sente nemmeno ctrl+c > >> >> >> sulla shell... quando il traffico finisce mi esegue tutto quello che > >> >> >> gli avevo mandato nel fratempo > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:01, Gioacchino Mazzurco <[email protected]> > >> >> >> ha > >> >> >> scritto: > >> >> >> >>Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal PC)? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > dovrei installarmi anche batman-adv sul pc... > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 12:58, Darkman <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> >> >> >> E' chiaro che non può essere il tuo upstream, > >> >> >> >> ma sei certo che il collo di bottiglia non sia nella capacità di > >> >> >> >> sta > >> >> >> >> rete > >> >> >> >> mesh tunnellata? > >> >> >> >> Hai provato a lanciare 2 iperf in parallelo? > >> >> >> >> Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal PC)? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:34, Gioacchino Mazzurco > >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> ha scritto: > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> la picostation a e la z sono la stessa picostation... dalla > >> >> >> >>> picostation a posso decidere se accendere tinc e quindi far > >> >> >> >>> passare > >> >> >> >>> traffico mesh su internet oppure se usare solo i link wireless > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> dal computer pocco decidere sia di usare la picostation come gw > >> >> >> >>> sia > >> >> >> >>> di > >> >> >> >>> usare il router adsl > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> le casistiche quindi sono 3 > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> iperf via internet senza tinc >500KB/s > >> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh senza tinc ~ 20Kb/s > >> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh tunnellata su internet con tinc ~100Kb/s > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:27, Darkman <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> >> >> >>> > Fammi capire: > >> >> >> >>> > - tra le tua pico(A) e quella(Z) con l'adsl ci sono diversi > >> >> >> >>> > nodi > >> >> >> >>> > e > >> >> >> >>> > con > >> >> >> >>> > iperf > >> >> >> >>> > hai risultati di 20Kbps (A->Z) in L3 puro ? Mentre se usi tinc > >> >> >> >>> > va > >> >> >> >>> > a > >> >> >> >>> > 100Kbps? > >> >> >> >>> > - chi sono gli end-point tinc? > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:12, Gioacchino Mazzurco > >> >> >> >>> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >>> > ha scritto: > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> senza tinc praticamente non c'e' connettivita' ( a volte va ma > >> >> >> >>> >> roba > >> >> >> >>> >> tipo 20k perche' sono un sacco di op alcuni dei quali fanno > >> >> >> >>> >> schifo...) > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> se invece faccio iperf passando per internet senza tinc > >> >> >> >>> >> ottengo > >> >> >> >>> >> risultati sempre sopra i 500KB/s > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:01, Darkman <[email protected]> ha > >> >> >> >>> >> scritto: > >> >> >> >>> >> > Hai gia controllato i valori tra le 2 pico con e senza tinc? > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:45, Gioacchino Mazzurco > >> >> >> >>> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >>> >> > ha scritto: > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> iperf -c su computer che usa una picostation come gateway > >> >> >> >>> >> >> -> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> Picostation con tinc <- adsl 8 megabit -> iperf --server su > >> >> >> >>> >> >> eigenlab.org > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 11:33, Darkman <[email protected]> ha > >> >> >> >>> >> >> scritto: > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > 100kbps mi pare davvero troppo poco anche per quelle > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > cessonanocpu. > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > Come li hai ottenuti sti valori? > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:10, Gioacchino Mazzurco > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > ha scritto: > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ciao a tutti! > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Facendo dei test mi sono accorto che le vpn con tinc > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> installato > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> sui > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> nodi ci vanno max a 100k anche se la banda dell'adsl e' > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> molta > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> di > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu'... ho cominciato a cercare ed ho letto che la causa > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e' > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> probabilmente la CPU che non ce la fa a fare encryption > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> decryption > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu' velocemente di cosi' > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> leggendo il man di tinc ho trovato questo > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Cipher = cipher (blowfish) > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> The symmetric cipher algorithm used to > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encrypt > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> UDP > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packets. Any cipher supported by OpenSSL is recognised. > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Fur†> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> thermore, specifying "none" will turn off > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packet > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption. It is best to use only those ciphers which > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> support > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> CBC mode. > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> mettendo none dovrebbe essere disabilitata l' > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption e > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> quindi > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> avere piu' banda, il meccanismo degli host con il file > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> con > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> chiave > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> pubblica continua a funzionare disabilitando la > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cifratura, > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> soprattutto bastera' aggiungere quell'opzione li oppure > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> bisogna > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cambiare altre conf? > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> >> > [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> > [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >>> [email protected] > >> >> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> Wireless mailing list > >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > Wireless mailing list > >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Wireless mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Wireless mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wireless mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > -- > > Antonio Quartulli > > > > ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. > > Ernesto "Che" Guevara > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireless mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- Antonio Quartulli ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. Ernesto "Che" Guevara _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
