sulla mia macchina sembra che siano disponibili solo cubic e reno
Il 03 luglio 2011 14:23, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > non so quale usa di default tu quale mi consigli di usare? > > Il 03 luglio 2011 14:18, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >> Bene, ora puoi ripetere le prove cambiando l'algoritmo di controllo di >> congestione sul client iperf. >> Cosa stai usando ora? Reno? >> >> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:09, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> ha scritto: >>> >>> altri test fissando la quantita' >>> >>> [ 4] 0.0-62.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 270 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-55.3 sec 2.00 MBytes 304 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-64.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 261 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-58.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 285 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-99.6 sec 2.00 MBytes 169 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-96.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 174 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-89.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 187 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-66.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 253 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-99.9 sec 2.00 MBytes 161 Kbits/sec >>> [ 4] 0.0-88.1 sec 2.00 MBytes 190 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:57, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >>> scritto: >>> > senza tinc la configurazione rimane uguale ma il traffico al posto di >>> > passare dal tunnel via internet passa solo attraverso i link wireless >>> > >>> > Il 03 luglio 2011 13:51, Antonio Quartulli <or...@autistici.org> ha >>> > scritto: >>> >> On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 01:48:37 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: >>> >>> il test e' sempre PC( iperf -c ) <-- cavo lan --> Piconstation ( >>> >>> btman-adv + tinc )<-- tinc ---> PC( batman-adv + tinc + iperf -s) >>> >> >>> >> anche senza TINC la configurazione rimane uguale? scusa ma non ho >>> >> capito >>> >> questo daalle mail precedenti >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo >>> >>> >deviati.. >>> >>> >>> >>> quei test non sono fatti in parallelo sono fatti in modo sequenziale >>> >>> quindi volta per volta c'e' ne e' attivo solo uno >>> >>> >>> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:40, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >>> >>> > Magari se scegliessi un test "unico" sarebbe anche meglio, >>> >>> > usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono troppo >>> >>> > deviati.. >>> >>> > Se non mi dicessi della CPU a palla, guardando sta roba ti direi che >>> >>> > è >>> >>> > congestione.. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:31, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >>> >>> > ha scritto: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> altra serie di test >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.8 sec 384 KBytes 167 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.5 sec 384 KBytes 180 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 384 KBytes 157 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.1 sec 384 KBytes 149 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-32.3 sec 384 KBytes 97.3 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.8 sec 384 KBytes 151 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-27.7 sec 256 KBytes 75.8 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.8 sec 256 KBytes 96.3 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.3 sec 512 KBytes 294 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.0 sec 512 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-37.6 sec 512 KBytes 112 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.7 sec 512 KBytes 224 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.3 sec 384 KBytes 148 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.9 sec 640 KBytes 293 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-24.8 sec 512 KBytes 169 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-16.4 sec 384 KBytes 192 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.4 sec 384 KBytes 147 Kbits/sec >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> ho spento dnsmasq che non serviva a niente e andiamo di poco ma >>> >>> >> meglio >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:16, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >>> >>> >> > Il sintomo è abbastanza chiaro, ma dubito sia colpa della CPU o >>> >>> >> > meglio, >>> >>> >> > secondo me qualcosa >>> >>> >> > è stata scritta male, 100Kbps sono davvero ridicoli. A maggior >>> >>> >> > ragione >>> >>> >> > quando ste cpu hanno anche qualche set dedicato >>> >>> >> > alla crittografia simmetrica... >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:04, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >> > ha scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> ma il problema sembra proprio l'eccessivo utilizzo di cpu per la >>> >>> >> >> vpn >>> >>> >> >> perche' stando in ssh sulla picostation mentre c'e' traffico che >>> >>> >> >> passa >>> >>> >> >> sulla vpn diventa completamente unresponsive non sente nemmeno >>> >>> >> >> ctrl+c >>> >>> >> >> sulla shell... quando il traffico finisce mi esegue tutto quello >>> >>> >> >> che >>> >>> >> >> gli avevo mandato nel fratempo >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:01, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> >> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >>> >>> >> >> scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal >>> >>> >> >> >> PC)? >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> > dovrei installarmi anche batman-adv sul pc... >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 12:58, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >>> >>> >> >> > scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >> E' chiaro che non può essere il tuo upstream, >>> >>> >> >> >> ma sei certo che il collo di bottiglia non sia nella capacità >>> >>> >> >> >> di sta >>> >>> >> >> >> rete >>> >>> >> >> >> mesh tunnellata? >>> >>> >> >> >> Hai provato a lanciare 2 iperf in parallelo? >>> >>> >> >> >> Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente (tincare dal >>> >>> >> >> >> PC)? >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:34, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> >> >> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >> >> >> ha scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> la picostation a e la z sono la stessa picostation... dalla >>> >>> >> >> >>> picostation a posso decidere se accendere tinc e quindi far >>> >>> >> >> >>> passare >>> >>> >> >> >>> traffico mesh su internet oppure se usare solo i link >>> >>> >> >> >>> wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> dal computer pocco decidere sia di usare la picostation come >>> >>> >> >> >>> gw sia >>> >>> >> >> >>> di >>> >>> >> >> >>> usare il router adsl >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> le casistiche quindi sono 3 >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via internet senza tinc >500KB/s >>> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh senza tinc ~ 20Kb/s >>> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh tunnellata su internet con tinc ~100Kb/s >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:27, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >>> >>> >> >> >>> scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> > Fammi capire: >>> >>> >> >> >>> > - tra le tua pico(A) e quella(Z) con l'adsl ci sono >>> >>> >> >> >>> > diversi nodi >>> >>> >> >> >>> > e >>> >>> >> >> >>> > con >>> >>> >> >> >>> > iperf >>> >>> >> >> >>> > hai risultati di 20Kbps (A->Z) in L3 puro ? Mentre se usi >>> >>> >> >> >>> > tinc va >>> >>> >> >> >>> > a >>> >>> >> >> >>> > 100Kbps? >>> >>> >> >> >>> > - chi sono gli end-point tinc? >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:12, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> >> >> >>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >> >> >>> > ha scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> senza tinc praticamente non c'e' connettivita' ( a volte >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> va ma >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> roba >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> tipo 20k perche' sono un sacco di op alcuni dei quali >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> fanno >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> schifo...) >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> se invece faccio iperf passando per internet senza tinc >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> ottengo >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> risultati sempre sopra i 500KB/s >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:01, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Hai gia controllato i valori tra le 2 pico con e senza >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > tinc? >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:45, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > ha scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> iperf -c su computer che usa una picostation come >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> gateway -> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Picostation con tinc <- adsl 8 megabit -> iperf >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --server su >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> eigenlab.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 11:33, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ha >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > 100kbps mi pare davvero troppo poco anche per quelle >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > cessonanocpu. >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Come li hai ottenuti sti valori? >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:10, Gioacchino Mazzurco >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > ha scritto: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ciao a tutti! >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Facendo dei test mi sono accorto che le vpn con >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> tinc >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> installato >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> sui >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> nodi ci vanno max a 100k anche se la banda >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> dell'adsl e' >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> molta >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> di >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu'... ho cominciato a cercare ed ho letto che la >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> causa >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e' >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> probabilmente la CPU che non ce la fa a fare >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> decryption >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu' velocemente di cosi' >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> leggendo il man di tinc ho trovato questo >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Cipher = cipher (blowfish) >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> The symmetric cipher algorithm used to >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encrypt >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> UDP >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packets. Any cipher supported by OpenSSL is >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> recognised. >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Fur†>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> thermore, specifying "none" will turn >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> off >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packet >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption. It is best to use only those ciphers >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> which >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> support >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> CBC mode. >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> mettendo none dovrebbe essere disabilitata l' >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption e >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> quindi >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> avere piu' banda, il meccanismo degli host con il >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> file con >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> chiave >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> pubblica continua a funzionare disabilitando la >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cifratura, >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> soprattutto bastera' aggiungere quell'opzione li >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> oppure >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> bisogna >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cambiare altre conf? >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> >>> > Wireless mailing list >>> >>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Wireless mailing list >>> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Antonio Quartulli >>> >> >>> >> ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. >>> >> Ernesto "Che" Guevara >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Wireless mailing list >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >> >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless