si disattivando non schizza piu' la cpu anche se la banda resta uguale P.S. metti in cc wireless quando rispondi ;)
Il 03 luglio 2011 22:27, Antonio Quartulli <or...@autistici.org> ha scritto: > On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 10:20:13 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: >> > come vedi che batman frammenta? se usi batctl td dovresti vedere i >> me ne accorgo perche' schizza la cpu >> >> che parametro devo passare a td per farmi dire la dimensione dei pacchetti? >> >> 1280 l'ho settato a mano sulle interfacce sui computer con iperf > > Comunque se hai disattivato la frammentazione su batman puoi star ben > sicuro che lui non la fara` :D > > >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 19:47, Antonio Quartulli <or...@autistici.org> ha scritto: >> > On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 07:41:24 +0200, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote: >> >> OK sembra un problema specifico di batman... non so aiutarti. >> >> >> >> Saverio >> >> >> >> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 16:43, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >> >> scritto: >> >> > nonostante l' mtu sia settato a 1280 ( quello dei pc con iperf ) la >> >> > cpu della pico schizzava uguale, ho disabilitato la frammentazione su >> >> > batman-adv la banda ora resta piu' o meno uguale ma la cpu non schizza >> >> > piu'... >> >> > >> >> > perche' batman frammenta anche se non dovrebbe essere necessario? ( >> >> > wireshark dice che i pacchetti che escono dalla mia macchina sono >> >> > ~700byte e l'mtu e' settato a 1280) >> > >> > come vedi che batman frammenta? se usi batctl td dovresti vedere i >> > singoli pacchetti (e puoi appurare se sono frammentati o meno). >> > E poi dove leggi l'MTU a 1280? >> > >> > Comunque hai detto che usi ipv6 con pmtu discovery giusto? quindi i >> > pacchetti verrano creati della dimensione esatta per non essere >> > frammentati >> > >> >> > >> >> > l' interfaccia tunnel che ha nome nnx-adv ha l'mtu settato a 1400 >> >> > mentre quello del bridge che contiene bat0 e' 1350 >> >> > >> >> > bat0 invece riporta 1373 nonostante quello del bridge sia 1350... ( >> >> > questo credo sia causato dal fatto che ho disabilitato la >> >> > fragmentation su batman-adv ) >> >> > >> >> > root@OpenWrt:~# brctl show >> >> > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> >> > br-clients 8000.7aa872dfafbe no bat0 >> >> > >> >> > root@OpenWrt:~# ip a s >> >> > 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN >> >> > link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 >> >> > inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo >> >> > inet6 ::1/128 scope host >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast >> >> > state UP qlen 1000 >> >> > link/ether 00:15:6d:7b:96:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> >> > inet 192.168.1.21/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0 >> >> > inet6 fe80::215:6dff:fe7b:967a/64 scope link >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > 4: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1524 qdisc mq state >> >> > UNKNOWN qlen 1000 >> >> > link/ether 00:15:6d:7a:96:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> >> > inet 192.168.1.21/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global wlan0 >> >> > inet6 2001:470:ca42:ee:ab:15:6d7a:967a/64 scope global >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > inet6 fe80::215:6dff:fe7a:967a/64 scope link >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > 5: bat0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1373 qdisc pfifo_fast >> >> > state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 >> >> > link/ether 7a:a8:72:df:af:be brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> >> > 7: br-clients: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1350 qdisc >> >> > noqueue state UNKNOWN >> >> > link/ether 7a:a8:72:df:af:be brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> >> > inet 192.168.167.21/24 brd 192.168.167.255 scope global br-clients >> >> > inet6 2001:470:ca42:ee:ab:15:6d7b:967a/64 scope global >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > inet6 fe80::78a8:72ff:fedf:afbe/64 scope link >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > 8: nnx-adv: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1400 qdisc >> >> > pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 500 >> >> > link/ether a2:19:0b:84:4f:5e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff >> >> > inet6 fe80::a019:bff:fe84:4f5e/64 scope link >> >> > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever >> >> > >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 16:12, Gioacchino Mazzurco <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >> >> > scritto: >> >> >> e' strano.. >> >> >> >> >> >> perche' io sto usando ipv6 per fare i test quindi il path mtu >> >> >> discovery dovrebbe funzionare e in effetti riducendo l'mtu a 1280 e >> >> >> disabilitando cipher ottengo un misero raddoppio della banda quando va >> >> >> bene... >> >> >> >> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 14:37, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >> >> >>> Quello che va meglio :) >> >> >>> Ce ne saranno una dozzina nel kernel, aggiungili. >> >> >>> Così, a naso, vista la natura particolare del canale, un algo >> >> >>> abbastanza >> >> >>> tollerante alle perdite/timeout. >> >> >>> Ma questo solo per capire sa cambia qualcosa o siamo sempre con gli >> >> >>> stessi >> >> >>> valori.. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:23, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>> ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> non so quale usa di default tu quale mi consigli di usare? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Il 03 luglio 2011 14:18, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha scritto: >> >> >>>> > Bene, ora puoi ripetere le prove cambiando l'algoritmo di >> >> >>>> > controllo di >> >> >>>> > congestione sul client iperf. >> >> >>>> > Cosa stai usando ora? Reno? >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 14:09, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> > ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> altri test fissando la quantita' >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-62.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 270 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-55.3 sec 2.00 MBytes 304 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-64.2 sec 2.00 MBytes 261 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-58.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 285 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-99.6 sec 2.00 MBytes 169 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-96.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 174 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-89.8 sec 2.00 MBytes 187 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-66.4 sec 2.00 MBytes 253 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-99.9 sec 2.00 MBytes 161 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> [ 4] 0.0-88.1 sec 2.00 MBytes 190 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:57, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >> >> >>>> >> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> > senza tinc la configurazione rimane uguale ma il traffico al >> >> >>>> >> > posto di >> >> >>>> >> > passare dal tunnel via internet passa solo attraverso i link >> >> >>>> >> > wireless >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 13:51, Antonio Quartulli >> >> >>>> >> > <or...@autistici.org> ha >> >> >>>> >> > scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >> On dom, lug 03, 2011 at 01:48:37 +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >>> il test e' sempre PC( iperf -c ) <-- cavo lan --> >> >> >>>> >> >>> Piconstation ( >> >> >>>> >> >>> btman-adv + tinc )<-- tinc ---> PC( batman-adv + tinc + iperf >> >> >>>> >> >>> -s) >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> anche senza TINC la configurazione rimane uguale? scusa ma non >> >> >>>> >> >> ho >> >> >>>> >> >> capito >> >> >>>> >> >> questo daalle mail precedenti >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono >> >> >>>> >> >>> >troppo >> >> >>>> >> >>> >deviati.. >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> quei test non sono fatti in parallelo sono fatti in modo >> >> >>>> >> >>> sequenziale >> >> >>>> >> >>> quindi volta per volta c'e' ne e' attivo solo uno >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:40, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> > Magari se scegliessi un test "unico" sarebbe anche meglio, >> >> >>>> >> >>> > usa un vincolo temporale o quantitativo, sti valori sono >> >> >>>> >> >>> > troppo >> >> >>>> >> >>> > deviati.. >> >> >>>> >> >>> > Se non mi dicessi della CPU a palla, guardando sta roba ti >> >> >>>> >> >>> > direi >> >> >>>> >> >>> > che >> >> >>>> >> >>> > è >> >> >>>> >> >>> > congestione.. >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:31, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >> >>> > ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> altra serie di test >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.8 sec 384 KBytes 167 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.5 sec 384 KBytes 180 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.0 sec 384 KBytes 157 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.1 sec 384 KBytes 149 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-32.3 sec 384 KBytes 97.3 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-20.8 sec 384 KBytes 151 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-27.7 sec 256 KBytes 75.8 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.8 sec 256 KBytes 96.3 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.3 sec 512 KBytes 294 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-14.0 sec 512 KBytes 299 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-37.6 sec 512 KBytes 112 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-18.7 sec 512 KBytes 224 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.3 sec 384 KBytes 148 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-17.9 sec 640 KBytes 293 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-24.8 sec 512 KBytes 169 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-23.5 sec 512 KBytes 178 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-16.4 sec 384 KBytes 192 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> [ 4] 0.0-21.4 sec 384 KBytes 147 Kbits/sec >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> ho spento dnsmasq che non serviva a niente e andiamo di >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> poco ma >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> meglio >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:16, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > Il sintomo è abbastanza chiaro, ma dubito sia colpa >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > della CPU >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > o >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > meglio, >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > secondo me qualcosa >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > è stata scritta male, 100Kbps sono davvero ridicoli. A >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > maggior >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > ragione >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > quando ste cpu hanno anche qualche set dedicato >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > alla crittografia simmetrica... >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 13:04, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ma il problema sembra proprio l'eccessivo utilizzo di >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> cpu per >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> la >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> vpn >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> perche' stando in ssh sulla picostation mentre c'e' >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> traffico >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> che >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> passa >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> sulla vpn diventa completamente unresponsive non sente >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> nemmeno >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> ctrl+c >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> sulla shell... quando il traffico finisce mi esegue >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> tutto >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> quello >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> che >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> gli avevo mandato nel fratempo >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 13:01, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>(tincare dal >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> PC)? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > dovrei installarmi anche batman-adv sul pc... >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > Il 03 luglio 2011 12:58, Darkman <dark...@darkman.it> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> E' chiaro che non può essere il tuo upstream, >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> ma sei certo che il collo di bottiglia non sia nella >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> capacità >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> di sta >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> rete >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> mesh tunnellata? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Hai provato a lanciare 2 iperf in parallelo? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Hai la possibilità di usare una CPU + potente >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> (tincare dal >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> PC)? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:34, Gioacchino Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> la picostation a e la z sono la stessa >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> picostation... >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> dalla >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> picostation a posso decidere se accendere tinc e >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> quindi >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> far >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> passare >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> traffico mesh su internet oppure se usare solo i >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> link >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> dal computer pocco decidere sia di usare la >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> picostation >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> come >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> gw sia >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> di >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> usare il router adsl >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> le casistiche quindi sono 3 >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via internet senza tinc >500KB/s >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh senza tinc ~ 20Kb/s >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> iperf via mesh tunnellata su internet con tinc >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> ~100Kb/s >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:27, Darkman >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> <dark...@darkman.it> ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Fammi capire: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > - tra le tua pico(A) e quella(Z) con l'adsl ci >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > sono >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > diversi nodi >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > e >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > con >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > iperf >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > hai risultati di 20Kbps (A->Z) in L3 puro ? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Mentre se >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > usi >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > tinc va >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > a >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > 100Kbps? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > - chi sono gli end-point tinc? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 12:12, Gioacchino >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> senza tinc praticamente non c'e' connettivita' ( >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> a >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> volte >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> va ma >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> roba >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> tipo 20k perche' sono un sacco di op alcuni dei >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> quali >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> fanno >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> schifo...) >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> se invece faccio iperf passando per internet >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> senza >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> tinc >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> ottengo >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> risultati sempre sopra i 500KB/s >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 12:01, Darkman >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> <dark...@darkman.it> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Hai gia controllato i valori tra le 2 pico con >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > e >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > senza >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > tinc? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:45, Gioacchino >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> iperf -c su computer che usa una picostation >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> come >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> gateway -> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Picostation con tinc <- adsl 8 megabit -> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> iperf >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> --server su >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> eigenlab.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Il 03 luglio 2011 11:33, Darkman >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> <dark...@darkman.it> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ha >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > 100kbps mi pare davvero troppo poco anche >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > per >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > quelle >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > cessonanocpu. >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Come li hai ottenuti sti valori? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Il giorno 03 luglio 2011 11:10, Gioacchino >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Mazzurco >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > <gmazzurc...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > ha scritto: >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Ciao a tutti! >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Facendo dei test mi sono accorto che le >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> vpn con >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> tinc >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> installato >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> sui >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> nodi ci vanno max a 100k anche se la banda >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> dell'adsl e' >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> molta >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> di >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu'... ho cominciato a cercare ed ho >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> letto che >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> causa >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e' >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> probabilmente la CPU che non ce la fa a >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> fare >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> decryption >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> piu' velocemente di cosi' >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> leggendo il man di tinc ho trovato questo >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Cipher = cipher (blowfish) >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> The symmetric cipher algorithm >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> used >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> to >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encrypt >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> UDP >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packets. Any cipher supported by OpenSSL >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> is >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> recognised. >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Fur†>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> thermore, specifying "none" >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> will >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> turn >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> off >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> packet >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption. It is best to use only those >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> ciphers >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> which >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> support >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> CBC mode. >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> mettendo none dovrebbe essere disabilitata >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> l' >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> encryption e >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> quindi >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> avere piu' banda, il meccanismo degli host >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> con >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> il >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> file con >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> la >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> chiave >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> pubblica continua a funzionare >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> disabilitando la >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cifratura, >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> e >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> soprattutto bastera' aggiungere >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> quell'opzione li >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> oppure >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> bisogna >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> cambiare altre conf? >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >>> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> -- >> >> >>>> >> >> Antonio Quartulli >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. >> >> >>>> >> >> Ernesto "Che" Guevara >> >> >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> >> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> > Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> > Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> Wireless mailing list >> >> >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> >> >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Antonio Quartulli >> > >> > ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. >> > Ernesto "Che" Guevara >> > > > -- > Antonio Quartulli > > ..each of us alone is worth nothing.. > Ernesto "Che" Guevara > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless