Hiya Todd,
 
The Lite is much less than $9k.  You can get the full version for that :)
 
Anyway, no one has the lite yet.  Not that I know of anyway.  The EC order should just now be showing up in the USA and they sell a lot of that stuff.
 
The standard gear does amazingly well in nlos situations!  It's really freaky stuff.  Note that if there are hills or a lot of trees in the way there's only so much that anyone can do for you.
 
I have heard of 30 mile shots with a tree at one end that show 100% uptime (just not all of it at top speed).
 
I don't get very impressed by most gear these days.  I've seen too much and have become somewhat jaded.  hehehehe  But I have just not heard anything bad about the gear or the people.  Ever.
 
that help?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181                                   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)                    Consulting services
42846865 (icq)                                    And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:25 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RE: Question about Orthogon Systems

Hello,
 
I am very much considering considering purchasing a Orthogon Gemeni lite system. I just wanted to ask if anyone else out there is using these systems currently in nlos applications and if so how well does it really work? 9 grand to find out is a rather expensive experiment. They claim you can make links where you would think it is impossible. However what they claim and what is true could very well be different as it is in so many other things in life. Any input would be much appreciated.
 
Thanks,
Todd Lancaster


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to