On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Scott Reed wrote:
In looking at that and some other things, I realize I really should
plan for redundant links to the POPs from the NOC.? I want to plan
to have it so that if the primary link goes down, another like will
take over.? Probably looking at OSPF routing.? That brings up the
questions.? Do I need to eventually have a link from every POP to
all other POPs it can see, or do I just plan for one backup for
each POP, or somewhere in between?? Is there a better way than OSPF
for doing this?
OSPF is certainly the best bet for this scenario. With OSPF, you
will have the self-healing you are looking for. You don't HAVE to
have a redundant path to every pop, but doing so would obviously
give you a more resiliant network. I sent you an email offlist as
well.
--
Butch Evans
BPS Networks http://www.bpsnetworks.com/
Bernie, MO
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
