802.11 uses ARQ for the RETRY, polling helps (turbocell, nstream, etc) Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems www.wbisp.com 781-846-6798 ext 6201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Pete Davis > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:29 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900MHz performance (Latency, Throughput) > > The 900Mhz pricing has always been higher than 2.4ghz 802.11x on price. > Probably always will be. > What 900mhz buys you is NLOS performance. 900mhz links will cut through > trees that 802.11b only dreams about. > I am not sure how well the new Ubiquiti cards running 802.11 on them > will do with NLOS. Waverider is the 900mhz I am familiar with, and part > of the positive things about it are the way it will retry packets up to > 3 times before failing them. I don't think that 802.11 has a packet > retry as part of its protocol. Another downside of Waverider (or any > other 900mhz as far as I know) its that a Waverider 900mhz Access point > (CCU) is only good for 2mbps total network throughput, and 1.5mbps to > any one client. > > > Pete Davis > NoDial.net > > > Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > > > > Something needs to be done about this 900mhz pricing, at these prices > > I can justify setting up more 2.4ghz to get to these last mile customers. > > > > Kurt Fankhauser > > > > WAVELINC > > > > 114 S. Walnut St. > > > > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > > > > 419-562-6405 > > > > www.wavelinc.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *On Behalf Of *Blair Davis > > *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 7:54 AM > > *To:* WISPA General List > > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 900MHz performance (Latency, Throughput) > > > > That is why I posted the request on 900MHz myself.... > > > > I am suprised that no distributors or manufactures has replied yet... > > > > Dylan Bouterse wrote: > > > > We are in the beginning stages of evaluating 900MHz for our wireless > > portfolio. I’m very interested to hear about implemented systems and > > what kind of max throughput and latency is expected. Any help is > > greatly appreciated. > > > > **Dylan Bouterse ****. **** **Sr. System Engineer > > > > _______________________ > > > > *p.* 352.253.2200 > > *f.* 352.742.2211 > > *e.* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>_ > > *i.* http://www.power1.com <http://www.power1.com/> - > > www.onepowerfulsolution.com <http://www.onepowerfulsolution.com/> - > > www.power1golf.com <http://www.power1golf.com/> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release Date: 2/16/2006 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Blair Davis > > > > AOL IM Screen Name -- Theory240 > > > > West Michigan Wireless ISP > > 269-686-8648 > > > > A division of: > > Camp Communication Services, INC > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 02/17/2006 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
