It is pretty much precluded by Roadrunner’s typical “Terms of Service” in their contract:
“(b) Subscriber will not resell the Service, or any portion thereof, or otherwise charge others to use the Service, or any portion thereof. The Service is for personal use only, and Subscriber agrees not to use the Service for operation as an Internet Service Provider, to host web sites for other parties or for any other business enterprise or to connect the Cable modem to any server or to any computer outside of the Subscriber's premises.”
Much more of the contract is available at: http://www.twcnc.com/road_runner/info/terms.cfm
. . . j o n a t h a n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith
I still don't see why anyone should be able to use my network without paying me for the right to do so. PERIOD.
I don't run a network for the benefit of the free world, I run it for the benefit of my checkbook. Which needs SERIOUS help. :)
OK, and while we're at it, why is "net neutral" good ? I admit I've ignored most of the discussions on it due to the fact that I'm NOT a supporter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Wu
out of curiosity (would like input from the pro net neutral people) -- would blocking something like FON constitute a violation of net neutrality?
-- WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless