One to One NATing is good except that it breaks H.323, and would limit VPN usage. Yes, there are Businesses that do Netmeeting and other H.323 applications as well as VPNs.
JT >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark McElvy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 04:07 PM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: RE: [WISPA] Managing CPE in routed network > >In the end I feel routed is better because you grow, a bridged network >will get loud (lots of overhead traffic). > > > >You manage the CPE in a routed network just as you do now. What maybe >you see is the difference between true routes and NAT routes. With true >routes there is a path to and from each subnet. You can easily get to >the web interface of each CPE in a properly routed network. A NAT router >hides the network behind the "WAN" address whether its private or public >and all traffic coming from the NAT subnet appears as if its coming from >the "WAN" address. Tranzeo APs, last time I tried, will not do true >routing only NAT routing. > > > >I also like the idea of one to one NATing the Public IP to the private >ip of the customer. > > > >Mark McElvy > >AccuBak Data Systems, Inc. > >573-729-9200 > > > >________________________________ > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Jason Hensley >Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:32 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List >Subject: [WISPA] Managing CPE in routed network > > > >Ok, this may be a simple question, but I'm trying to figure the best way >to do this. My wireless network is currently all bridged with three >different POP's (all statically assigned private IP's). I'm getting >requests for public IP addresses and as I add more clients, I feel like >I'm really going to need to have a routed network. > > > >My biggest question is, how do you manage your CPE remotely in a routed >network? Right now I'm pretty much 90% Tranzeo gear (mixture of >CPE-15's and CPQ gear). If a customer calls with performance or other >problems, I'm able to log into their CPE from here to see what's going >on from that end. I would much rather maintain that ability but not >sure how to do that with a routed network. > > > >Also, I would ideally like to have a public IP assigned to each CPE. >The double NAT'ing I've got going right now has been causing a few >issues, plus, I'm getting more business customers that want VPN and >Remote Access to their network. > > > >I realize this will take subnetting to make it happen. I've got a /24 >right now and can easily bump to more when needed. > > > >How are the rest of you handling your setups like this? > > > >Thanks in advance! > > > >________________________________ > >Jason Hensley, MCP+I >President > >Mozarks Technologies >909 Preacher Roe Blvd >West Plains, MO 65775 > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.mozarks.com > >417.256.7946 >417.257.2415 (fax) > > -- WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/