Have you heard of any Muni Wi-Fi network that is fee based with more
than 10,000 connections per month?
-Matt
Patrick Leary wrote:
Airports are the only place where I have ever chosen to pay for a Wi-Fi
connection. So I agree. But the rate is still too high such that I will
not pay unless I have over an hour and I really need to get on.
That is also why I like airports like Vegas (America West) and Tampa
(Delta) where access is free, at least in the terminals I use.
Patrick Leary
AVP Marketing
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:13 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Fee-based Wi-Fi = no return on investment
From http://wifinetnews.com/archives/006941.html...
It seems the Philly airport is only seeing 10,000 connections per month
on their Wi-Fi network. I would argue that an airport is one of the top
places where someone would be willing to pay for a Wi-Fi connection.
10,000 connections per month is going to take a long long time to return
the investment spent putting in the network.
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
