I suppose this information would be meaningful if I had any idea what
you were talking about. Can you maybe put your thoughts into language
people can understand who do not have intimate knowledge of the product
you are discussing? I would really like to know what the differences are
between the two products but I cannot understand what you are talking
about here. Your help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Scriv
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
After spending a lot of time working with a couple WLM54AG's, I know
without a doubt that the "main" is different for a CM9 and the Compex radio.
You can switch to the "b" port, but as best I can tell, you still have some
loss as compared to using the main port.
In "auto", the difference between the two is around 12 db, manually chosen
or forced to one port or the other, it appears to be well more than 20 db
isolation between them.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark McElvy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
Did not try the other port and the signals were lower on both ends.
Mark
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
Did you try both antenna ports? On the two that connected, were the
signals 12 to 14dB lower on both sides of the link?
-Hal
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
