Exactly. We are building out a 4.9 network, but it is a backhaul network.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:20 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Public Safety Exactly, and I'm sure Blake wil also agree that 4.9 GHz is useful only for fixed multipoint, PtP, or picocell tactical mesh (ala Packethop). I should not say "only" because these are vital needs and enable large, secure and relatively interference-immune pipes. But since public safety workers spend most of their time in the field, the critical need is mobile broadband access -- and the more dedicated in nature (as in reserved for them) the better. And certainly there are not enough dollars in the world to build a ubiquitous 4.9 GHz network; it simply is not the band for such a thing and such an idea would be absurd. - Patrick, Alvarion -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your feelings about allowing advertisements on the free WISPA lists. The current Board is taking this under consideration at this time. We want to know your thoughts. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
