It has to do with CPU load.

Since the FDD is running two radios, its doing twice as much work as the 
one running a single radio.  I have observed the FDD links doing 
50-55meg in one direction, and my guess is that the most common loaded 
FDD links will be doing 40-50 in one direction and 10-15 in the other.

With more CPU, I'm sure that the speeds will go up considerably.

Matt Larsen
Vistabeam.com

Travis Johnson wrote:
> Matt,
>
> A quick question on your examples...
>
> on the 10 mile link you are getting 45Mbps with 20Mhz, but on the 
> full-duplex link going the same distance, you are only getting 30Mbps. 
> Why is there a 50% loss when doing full-duplex?
>
> Also, are you testing with TCP or UDP?
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
>> OK, here are some real world examples:
>>
>> 5.3ghz 40mhz channel, 8.5 miles.   WAR4/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless 
>> Antennas.    50meg one way.
>> 5.7ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles.    WAR2/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless 
>> Antennas.   45meg one way (CPU maxes out on WAR2s)
>> 5.7ghz 10mhz channel, 42 miles     WAR4/SR5 attached to 34db Radiowaves 
>> Antennas.    18meg one way.
>> FDD 5.2ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles     X4000/R52H attached to 29db 
>> Pacwireless/21db MTI panel. 
>>         5.8ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles     X4000/R52H attached to 21db 
>> MTI Panel/29db Pacwireless  30 down, 30 up
>>
>> for comparison:  Motorola Gemini Lite (30meg bh) on the same link - 3meg 
>> down, 3 up
>>
>> We have several RB532 backhauls in the air, and even with all the 
>> optimization we can do to them, we never get better than 20 meg in one 
>> direction.  Replacing the RB532s with WAR2s (266mhz CPU, comparable to 
>> an RB532) nearly doubles the speed.
>>
>> On comparable hardware, I have not come across ANY Mikrotik system that 
>> will keep up with StarOS when it comes to dedicated backhaul.   
>>
>> Matt Larsen
>> Inventive Media
>>
>>
>> Mark Nash wrote:
>>   
>>> 5.3GHz 40MHz channel, 1.5 miles.   WAR4-METRO/SR5 inside 24dbi RooTennas. 
>>> Testing beyond each ethernet port.  2 weeks non-stop stress-testing after 
>>> we 
>>> installed and before we deployed gave us 70 megs one way.  The MRTG graph 
>>> looked like a solid block without any deviation.
>>>
>>> Mark Nash
>>> UnwiredWest
>>> 78 Centennial Loop
>>> Suite E
>>> Eugene, OR 97401
>>> 541-998-5555
>>> 541-998-5599 fax
>>> http://www.unwiredwest.com
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>> I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both
>>>> sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets 
>>>> get
>>>> real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test and "maybe"
>>>> if I hold one hand in the air, twist my lips standing on one leg.
>>>>
>>>> I mean real world - whatcha getting?? Whatcha see and is it a bench test 
>>>> or
>>>> are you in the real WISP world? :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mac
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>>>> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:51 PM
>>>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
>>>>>
>>>>> 50 both ways with N-Stream dual and Turbo mode...
>>>>>
>>>>> Dennis M. Burgess
>>>>> Mikrotik Certified Consultant
>>>>> Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
>>>>> --WISP/Network Support Services--
>>>>> +1 314-686-1302
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>>>> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:46 PM
>>>>> To: WISPA General List
>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Mikrotik can do 70 megs or more over 40 MHz as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to