Here is a real world MT test running RB532's (333mhz) with v3.2 OS:
5.3ghz, 3 miles, 10mhz channel, 18.3Mbps one direction
5.8ghz, 9 miles, 20mhz channel, 27.3Mbps one direction
A more comparable test would be using the new MT RB600 units (as they
are almost exactly the same price as the WAR4 boards). I will get a
couple ordered and deployed so we can do some comparable testing. :)
Travis
Microserv
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
OK, here are some real world examples:
5.3ghz 40mhz channel, 8.5 miles. WAR4/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless
Antennas. 50meg one way.
5.7ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles. WAR2/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless
Antennas. 45meg one way (CPU maxes out on WAR2s)
5.7ghz 10mhz channel, 42 miles WAR4/SR5 attached to 34db Radiowaves
Antennas. 18meg one way.
FDD 5.2ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles X4000/R52H attached to 29db
Pacwireless/21db MTI panel.
5.8ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles X4000/R52H attached to 21db
MTI Panel/29db Pacwireless 30 down, 30 up
for comparison: Motorola Gemini Lite (30meg bh) on the same link - 3meg
down, 3 up
We have several RB532 backhauls in the air, and even with all the
optimization we can do to them, we never get better than 20 meg in one
direction. Replacing the RB532s with WAR2s (266mhz CPU, comparable to
an RB532) nearly doubles the speed.
On comparable hardware, I have not come across ANY Mikrotik system that
will keep up with StarOS when it comes to dedicated backhaul.
Matt Larsen
Inventive Media
Mark Nash wrote:
5.3GHz 40MHz channel, 1.5 miles. WAR4-METRO/SR5 inside 24dbi RooTennas.
Testing beyond each ethernet port. 2 weeks non-stop stress-testing after we
installed and before we deployed gave us 70 megs one way. The MRTG graph
looked like a solid block without any deviation.
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-5555
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
I haven't seen those results, but I have seen 12MbpsFDX with a -63 on both
sides running Nstream2. If we are going to talk REAL THROUGHPUT - - lets
get
real and everyone use real figures. I ain't talking bench test and "maybe"
if I hold one hand in the air, twist my lips standing on one leg.
I mean real world - whatcha getting?? Whatcha see and is it a bench test
or
are you in the real WISP world? :)
Mac
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
50 both ways with N-Stream dual and Turbo mode...
Dennis M. Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
--WISP/Network Support Services--
+1 314-686-1302
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
Mikrotik can do 70 megs or more over 40 MHz as well.
----------
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
|
