So that is roughly 10 square miles per cell for rural deployment? Seems like a pretty tough sell in rural markets with low pop. Densities.
Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Booher Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Australian WiMAX pioneertrashestechnologyas"miserablefailure" I would agree. In a dense urban enviorment the usual cell size for a 3.65ghz wimax deployment is a 1km/ cell. Suburban, 2km cell, and rural, 3km cell. Obviously once you get below 3ghz the propogation gets better. It really doesnt get any better until you are talking 2ghz or lower. Of course, then once you get below 1ghz you have issues with surface refactivity and self induced interference limiting the CINR. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
