of course, thats to an indoor device, assuming macro diversity gain as well.
outdoor 3.65ghz, 5-7 miles NLOS is capable in a flat, rural environment. Estimate around 4 miles in a mixed ( suburban / trees ) enviorment. This is NLOS as well. - Jeff On Mar 24, 2008, at 12:25 PM, chris cooper wrote: > So that is roughly 10 square miles per cell for rural deployment? > Seems > like a pretty tough sell in rural markets with low pop. Densities. > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > Behalf Of Jeff Booher > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 3:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Australian WiMAX > pioneertrashestechnologyas"miserablefailure" > > I would agree. > > In a dense urban enviorment the usual cell size for a 3.65ghz wimax > deployment is a 1km/ cell. Suburban, 2km cell, and rural, 3km cell. > Obviously once you get below 3ghz the propogation gets better. It > really doesnt get any better until you are talking 2ghz or lower. Of > course, then once you get below 1ghz you have issues with surface > refactivity and self induced interference limiting the CINR. > > > - > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
