I guess the answer is in what the definition is of "Real World" :-)

For the record my conservative comment was not meant to be against Ligowave, 
but specific to Atheros Mini PCi Cards in general, regardless of the 
software platform.
I agree if you can get a peak modulation consistently w/ compression, sure 
you can get the speed. The Ligo MB hardware has the processing power to do 
the speed, with multiple cards.
However, in my real world, we are lucky to get 18 mbps modulations, 
allthough when doing 20Mhz channels we always try for 36mbps mod  if we can. 
I'm not possitive, but I think the 10Mhz channel may max out at 27mbps 
modulation as an option, with Atheros. (Although That should be verified 
with Ligo, as I may be mistaken). The problem with commercial grade services 
is that they generally don't respond well to frequent modulation changes. If 
a modulation is bouncing back and forth from 36 to 18 to 24  to 36, etc, it 
will have very undesirable effects on the End Users' TCP session throughput. 
We have found it much more advantageous to hard set the Max modulation to a 
lower number that would result in the least frequent amount of automatic 
modulation changes. It doesn't matter how fast the radio can test in peak 
situations, it matters how fast the end user can push their data 
consistently. Usually the best we can count on consistently is usually 
closer to 15mbps, in our environment.  We bit ourselves in the Back-side to 
often quoting 10mbps Full Duplex, and only getting 5 mb on way and 10 mbps 
the other, and having our customers Claim we didn't deliver our SLA, and 
having to requote/redefine the job.  I'm not saying that people can't get 
20mbps, some people here, have just clearly stated that it was possible for 
them. I just suggest planning for the worst, and being conservative in 
expectation.

With that said my comment  is not a complaint. I can get qty 4- 15 mbps 
links out of that one 533 Ligo Box, with 10mhz channels, which is pretty 
darn amazing.

What I liked about Ligo though is their support. They try hard to please.
There software is also very easy to navigate and intuitive.
Its a bit slow to navigate (compared to StarOS or MikroTik), due to web 
interface redraw time between screens, but that's not really a big deal.
My units have shown to pretty much be install and leave it units, with very 
little trouble.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason Hensley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?


> For the record as well, this is with Fast Frames, Packet Bursting, and
> Compression all turned on.  We bounce anywhere from 18-20 meg.  Very 
> excited
> about it and EXTREMELY pleased with the results we've had from the 
> Ligowave
> gear.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Hensley
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:52 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
>
> Nope, actually getting 20meg off a 10mhz channel in real world high noise
> environment.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:44 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
>
> We have never been able to get 20mbps realworld out of a 10mhz channel
> w/Ligo, or any OEM style unit.  I'd say you are being a bit on the
> optimistic side, or talking best case lab testing.
>
> What I will say is,  Ligo was my winner for best "Hardware" package. They
> make it solid, from case, to MB, to Pigtail.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Hensley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
>
>
>> Wes,
>>
>> Are these lab results or "real-world"?  Matt (Hardy) has mentioned
>> some similar speeds on some of your other gear as well.  For the
>> record I'm able to pull 20meg on a 10mhz channel with Ligowave gear
>> (real-world, 802.11a in a very noisy environment) so I can vouch that
>> it's good stuff - especially for the price.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Wes James
>> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 12:30 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List; Tom Sharples
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
>>
>> For reference, here is a comparison between single and dual radio MESH
>> throughput.
>>
>>
>> Wes James
>> Ligowave
>> 800.742.9865
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Rogelio
>> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:20 AM
>> To: Tom Sharples; WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] mesh throughput?
>>
>> Tom Sharples wrote:
>>> You must be looking at some older technologies. In clean environments,
>> we're
>>> seeing  20+ mb/s net data throughput on our dual radio nodes (5 Ghz).
>>
>> Ah, very cool.  Please share with me these vendors!
>>
>> So, assuming that you set up the channels to not step on each other, this
>> type of throughput is fairly solid for a dual radio units?
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to