I totally disagree with that David. A cache server will often make yahoo and other common sites load in MUCH less time. There won't be much real change in speeds (like when doing a bw test) but the look and feel will be much better. marlon
----- Original Message ----- From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:03 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Any thoughts on a decent cache server > Patrick Nix Jr. wrote: >> So is it safer/better to avoid caching servers altogether? > > About 99% of your users won't notice, or know, or care, that you've got > anything like that in your network. The savings in bandwidth (and, to a > lesser extent, money not spent on bandwidth) can help you out of a tight > spot. Just be aware that the last 1% of customers can get you into > trouble. > > David Smith > MVN.net > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
