Don't call me an idiot you imbecile, I am an moron.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem


>A requirement, yes.  A burden, no.  Just about any idiot can become an
> amateur operator these days.
>
>
> ----------
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
>
>
>> Remember that one of the ham radio provisions is that you need to be a
>> ham...  :)
>>
>> Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
>>> Also, read the actual code/charter that regulates the activity to find
>>> exemptions. Here in Prince George's county, MD, antennas that fall below
>>> a certain size and power output are considered "minimal" (forget the
>>> exact wording) and can be installed on an existing structure without
>>> going through the permit process.
>>>
>>> Theoretically this would allow one to construct a tower using the
>>> amateur radio protections, then load it up with antennas for WISP use
>>> once the tower is constructed and signed off.
>>>
>>> Patrick Shoemaker
>>> President, Vector Data Systems LLC
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> office: (301) 358-1690 x36
>>> http://www.vectordatasystems.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom DeReggi wrote:
>>>
>>>> One way to do it is...
>>>>
>>>> You get the tower up via HAM rules, and don't provide commercial use.
>>>> BUilt
>>>> it just large enoug that it would hold only your antennas.
>>>>
>>>> Then after the fact....
>>>> There are some local code issues that often incourage someone to 
>>>> attempt
>>>> to
>>>> find a pre-existing structures to colocate on, prior to being 
>>>> authorized
>>>> to
>>>> build a new tower.
>>>> Argue, for them to expand the permit for the pre-existing HAM tower, to
>>>> one
>>>> allowing limited commercial use for your antennas, in trade for not
>>>> proposing and building ANOTHER ugly larger tower right next to it.
>>>>
>>>> Tom DeReggi
>>>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>>>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>> < NOTE TO OUR ESTEEMED READERS: For your greater reading pleasure and 
>>>> to
>>>> relieve the load on your computer, 569 pages of previously-offered
>>>> wordly wisdom has been removed from this message > *
>> -
>> Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
>> Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
>> Cisco Press Author - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
>> NEXT ONLINE TRAINING AUGUST 18-19 2008
>> <http://www.linktechs.net/askwi.asp>
>> FCC Lic. #PG-12-25133 LinkedIn Profile
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jackunger>
>> Phone 818-227-4220  Email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to