I agree - I have heard and seen a lot of Cisco equipment last many
years, others only a few months.  Both ends had expensive options (in
the thousands).

On 6/4/09, Rogelio <scubac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Travis Johnson wrote:
>> I have about 80 Cisco 2900 and 3500 switches servicing our fiber ring.
>> Most of them are 5+ years old and were purchased used on ebay for $400,
>> and some are older. Some of these have "uptimes" of over 4 years right
>> now. :)
>>
>> Cisco hardware just works. It's expensive, and the software can be
>> buggy... but the hardware works.
>
> A lot depends on the company that originally made the hardware.
>
> In some cases, Cisco bought a great hardware manufacturer, in which case
> that hardware lasted a long time. In other cases, they acquired a crap
> company, painted Cisco on it, and then kludged in their shell environment.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to