I'd offer technical reason not to buy 900 system based primarily on 
price. The build-your-own gear using XR9 or SR9 type cards or wifi 
systems converted to do 900 are inferior to popular proprietary 900 
systems in many cases where interference exists. 

I have used Alvarion BA-II 900, Trango 900, MT+SR9, MT+XR9, and Alvarion 
VL900. We have neighboring competitors using Canopy 900 and 
Vecima/Waverider 900. There are also water utilities using 900 in some 
nearby cities.

The Alvarion gear (both types) has lots of little things you can tweek 
to compensate for various things that cause performance trouble. They 
are really well thought out and have a bit of a learning curve to get 
the best performance out of them.  The trango is much simpler, and less 
sensitive. It works full speed all the time unless the signal gets too 
low or interference causes it to lose packets. It's fairly robust. The 
SR9 system was fairly finicky and provided intermittent results in the 
vicinity of our BA-II 900 system, even with good frequency and distance 
separation. We dumped it. The XR9 based system seems capable of good 
speed in good conditions, but was very finicky and unreliable in the 
presence of Alvarion VL900 gear also in different frequncies and 
physical separation. We've still got it, but aren't using it. The 
SR9/XR9 MT based systems do not have the controls and tweeks available 
on the Alvarion systems in terms of noise immunity, atpc, modulation 
activity, etc.. Canopy is said to work well, but it's capacity has been 
lacking, trango is no longer affordable new on a per SU basis. BA-II 900 
is reliable and cheap but doesn't have enough capacity for a new 
deployment. Waveride didn't have the right remote management when we 
looked into that. Alvarion VL is about the same cost as their other VL 
products, not UBNT/MT cheap, but less expensive than some of their 
proprietary competitors.


On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:16:56PM -0700, Forbes Mercy wrote:
> I am curious if anyone can tell me the technical reason why 900MHZ has
> no reasonable cost CPE.  Here I am paying $70 for CPE on 2.4 gear, $90
> for 5.8 but the best price I can find is $290 for 900 MHZ.  Just curious
> as to why?
> 
> Forbes

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
    KB1IOJ        |   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Maine    http://www.midcoast.com/
*/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to