But i believe the RB1000 has a coprocessor for certain applicaitons so you 
can't really have a global which is better although you could choose the 
best tool for certain task...   

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
-------- Original Message --------
> From: "can...@believewireless.net" <p...@believewireless.net>
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:49 AM
> To: "n...@brevardwireless.com" <n...@brevardwireless.com>, "WISPA General 
List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
> 
> If you are doing BGP, I will take a dual core CPU over a single core
> even if it's slower.  On Mikrotik, BGP updates kill the CPU which can
> cause packet loss and other issues that happen when the CPU spikes to
> 100%.  With dual cores, BGP updates eat up 100% of only one core and
> the second can handle routing and other functions.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Nick Olsen <n...@brevardwireless.com> 
wrote:
> > I figure the RB1000 is faster, its "made" for routing.
> > But I'm sure the atom platform could hold its ground.
> > I'd mainly like to see bandwidth tests.
> >
> > Nick Olsen
> > Brevard Wireless
> > (321) 205-1100 x106
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> > From: "Travis Johnson" <t...@ida.net>
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:09 AM
> > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT on Atom
> >
> > In our bench testing, the RB1000 actually performs very well. You 
can't
> > just compare CPU's (as I'm sure you know). The RB1000 was designed 
from
> > the ground up to move packets. The Atom CPU was designed as an
> > inexpensive computer system.
> >
> > I think I have a dual-core 1.6ghz Atom board and CPU (Intel brand of
> > both) and an RB1000. I can run some performance tests... what do you
> > want to see?
> >
> > Travis
> > Microserv
> >
> > Butch Evans wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 13:10 -0600, Travis Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Probably about the equivalent of the RB1000 (but only  with 2 FE 
ports).
> >
> >
> >
> > About the equivalent of the rb1000?  You gotta be kidding!  RB1000 is
> > 1.3GHz SINGLE CORE cpu.  That one is 1.6GHz Dual-core.  It'll be a LOT
> > more different than just the 2XFE (vs 4XGig).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> 
> 
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to