On 03/29/2010 01:13 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > I don't believe that. I've turned people in and the FCC dealt with them. I > know of others that have also had success. > > Perhaps someone went about turning them in the wrong way? > > You do need some good proof. Spec analyzer readings, pics etc. > > If you need help give me a shout and I'll help you put together the info > you'll need and get you to the right people. > I agree...have some documentation in hand and collect it as you go. As I said earlier, a call to your Congressman is usually helpful if the direct approach doesn't work.
Leon > marlon > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 2:37 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Oh this business, tell me again why we love it?! > > > >> Negative. I know of an ISP using 5 watt amps on 2.4ghz omni antennas. >> They have been reported several times to the FCC, and nothing happens. >> >> Travis >> Microserv >> >> Leon D. Zetekoff wrote: >> >>> On 03/27/2010 03:58 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Regarding the competetor, if you can prove that your competetor is >>>> intentionally interfering with you, the FCC will actually get involved >>>> but it will take a long and painful paper-trail to build a strong enough >>>> case. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> if they are using amps, then the FCC would get involved. >>> >>> leon >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
