I plan to IPv6 in the next year or so. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/2/2010 10:04 AM, Jeremy Parr wrote: > Reason number 5392 to not NAT your customers. Along those lines, who > is rolling out a dual stack ipv6 network? > > On 8/2/10, Kurt Fankhauser<[email protected]> wrote: >> So does anyone here have any customers that use XBOX live and bark to you >> about you NAT? Apparently the XBOX live service is very picky about being >> behind any NAT device and its ability to make connections to other servers. >> > From what I gathered is that the LIVE service uses Universal Plug and Play >> (UPnP) to get around this but the question I have is. If your doing >> masquerade on a Mikrotik Core Router should you enable UPnP on that device? >> Or should I just issue public IP's to the customer that games and let them >> worry about it? And if you have UPnP enabled on the core router and then do >> a double-NAT through the customers Linksys router with UPnP enable does that >> not work because of the double-NAT? >> >> >> >> Kurt Fankhauser >> WAVELINC >> P.O. Box 126 >> Bucyrus, OH 44820 >> 419-562-6405 >> www.wavelinc.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
