It will link in 1X mode at 3dB S/N and 2X at 10dB S/N. you need to maintain 
those levels so you need to add enough gain to deal with trees in the spring 
which tend to have the highest loss of the year.

with that said, 900 MHz is a bad bet IMO.

If you plan to roll out 900, you need to look at it one of two ways:
1. the noise is as bad as it's going to get (i.e. smart meters or other FHSS 
900MHz system are rolled out) and you engineer around it.
2. you plan for a future noise floor of -60dB and engineer around that.

- Jerry

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of chris cooper
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 12:43 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trees under half mile

Ive never deployed Canopy 900.  Vendor materials say it will work at a 3 db 
C/I.  Can you keep a solid connection w/ decent throughput at that ratio?

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Jason Hensley
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:05 PM
To: [email protected]; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trees under half mile

At my house, I live in a hole with about ¾ mile of solid oak trees between me 
and the tower.  2.4Ghz in the late spring (meaning good, saturated leaves) I 
can run 4meg.  When it rains, service will be spotty and sometimes drop.  I 
would never install a customer in those conditions.  We do have a few customers 
through trees, but with our noise floor here, we don't do much more than just a 
few trees at a pretty close proximity to our AP's.   I wouldn't even think 
about 5Ghz through trees at all.  3650 - haven't done anything through trees 
yet so I don't know.

900Mhz worked great for us for awhile but noise floor went too high and 
couldn't work around it so we pulled all our 900 equipment.


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Nick White
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trees under half mile

So what kinds of distances are people currently going through trees, and what 
kinds of signals, CCQ, throughput, etc. are you seeing? I guess I'm looking for 
success stories. I need to sell this to the partners. I know it can be done, 
and I'm fairly confident it will work in this situation, but they aren't.

I've found a few instances online of people going 1 mile with 5.8 through some 
trees and still pulling off a -65 and 20Mbps of throughput - this was PTP.

I know 3.65Ghz is supposed to be somewhere between 2.4 and 5.8 in terms of tree 
penetration, but I'm thinking this might be a good place to use 3.65, simply 
because of the lack of noise.

I have never worked with 900Mhz as of yet. This was our initial alternative, 
but there is the added cost of deployment - $160 for a LocoM900 vs $80 for a 
NanobridgeM2. Literally doubles our ROI.


On 9/13/2010 3:58 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe - someone 
will correct me if I am wrong.
If you are using airmax - 2.4 should help

5ghz you may have some issues w/ trees however

My suggestion is a mix - I noticed that you have not mentioned 900mhz
900 and trees especially at that distance - sub 1 mile is awesome - but doubt 
you will see the 10mbps speeds you wish.

5ghz is your best choice - if you can use it.

setting up both 2.4 and 5ghz sectors may help - double the cost - but in the 
end - would allow you the most flexibility


On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Nick White wrote:

om this tower, no one in town would be more than .75 miles
away. I'm thinking 10Mhz channels - 1, 6, 11. If we do this, I will
likely use the UBNT shields that I've seen for sale with three 120deg
sectors.

_____________________________________________________________________________________
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic 
|www.HostMedic.com<http://www.HostMedic.com>
  Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.










--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3137 - Release Date: 09/15/10 
14:34:00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to