I am unaware of the 99 limit. I actually have a set at 185 ft. Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Glenn Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > 3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe - > someone will correct me if I am wrong. > If you are using airmax - 2.4 should help > > 5ghz you may have some issues w/ trees however > > My suggestion is a mix - I noticed that you have not mentioned 900mhz > 900 and trees especially at that distance - sub 1 mile is awesome - but doubt > you will see the 10mbps speeds you wish. > > 5ghz is your best choice - if you can use it. > > setting up both 2.4 and 5ghz sectors may help - double the cost - but in the > end - would allow you the most flexibility > > > On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Nick White wrote: > >> om this tower, no one in town would be more than .75 miles >> away. I'm thinking 10Mhz channels - 1, 6, 11. If we do this, I will >> likely use the UBNT shields that I've seen for sale with three 120deg >> sectors. > > _____________________________________________________________________________________ > Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com > Email: [email protected] > Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
