My Ceragons do not have a telnet interface. After finding it was the Win32 app alone I knew it would be a disaster. The customer that had us put them up, my first experience, had a Tsunami link work for the better part of a decade. The Ceragon worked for a few months, at the most, before an IDU or ODU needed replaced, it locked up (MAJOR bug for the first year of use), etc.
Using an SAF 11 Ghz as of 2 weeks ago. No real comparison of product, just mentioning. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Brad Belton <b...@belwave.com> wrote: > Ceragon Telnet interface is terrible? I’ve never used the CeraView > software, but not much to complain about with the Telnet interface. Then > again I can’t stand the Trango web GUI either…I only use Telnet for our > Trango links. So if you’re a GUI guy then I understand. > > > > If we can pretty much set ‘em and forget ‘em then they’re ok in our book. > <grin> > > > > You want to complain about user interface…try spending some time with the > PCOM “Link Manager” GUI interface. Now that is a sucky interface! > Fortunately the few PCOM radios we have left out there have been pretty much > rock solid. > > > > Best, > > > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:15 PM > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops > > > > The air must be different there. I can't stand Ceragon stuff. Nothing but > problems. Zero support. The firmware is terrible as is the interface. > > On Nov 4, 2010 9:58 PM, "Brad Belton" <b...@belwave.com> wrote: > > Agreed. We have had Ser# 00000001 11GHz Trango GigaLINK in service since > early 2008 among several others since then with great service. The few times > we’ve needed Trango support they have been extremely responsive and helpful. > > > > > > > > > I think we also have one of the first if not the first 18GHz GigaLINK in > service too since mid 2007. We’ll be hanging three more Trango Giga’s & > Apex’s in the next few weeks. We have always been early adopters of > Sunstream/Trango equipment. > > > > > > > > We have DragonWave, BridgeWave, Trango, DMC, Ceragon and PCOM licensed > gear deployed and active in 6GHz, 11GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 38GHz and 70-80GHz on > our network. By far the Trango, BridgeWave and Ceragon links are our > favorites. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias > > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 5:21 PM > > To: WISPA General List > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops > > > > > > > > We use Trango GigaLinks almost exclusively in our network; 6ghz, 11ghz, > 18ghz, and 23ghz. They work very well & support thus far has been great. > > > > > > -- > > > > Blake Covarrubias > > > > > > On Nov 4, 2010, at 14:43, "Nick Olsen" <n...@brevardwireless.com> wrote: > > > > I've worked with a few of the Trango Apex 11ghz links. Running 256QAM > they will do ~258Mb/s full duplex, or something like that. > > .8 to 1ms across it, With 10Mb/s or 200Mb/s of traffic on it. So far, > They've been the best links I've had the pleasure of working with. In terms > of performance, And management. > > > > Nick Olsen > > Network Operations > > > > (855) FLSPEED x106 > > > > <http://www.flhsi.com/files/emaillogo.jpg> > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > From: "David E. Smith" <d...@mvn.net> > > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 5:32 PM > > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 16:20, Matt <lm7...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We are looking at upgrading our network and adding a handful(7) 11ghz > > licensed hops. What gear out there can use both horizontal and > > vertical at once to increase throughput? We are currently considering > > Exalt. Short coming of 11 ghz and longish 25 mile hops is throughput. > > We do not need a lot of bandwidth at the start but would like to be > > ready to if needed. This will replace a couple DS3 circuits. > > > > > > > > How much throughput do you need? Trango's Apex gear can, if you have big > enough antennas and pay for the licensing (both FCC and for Trango's > software), do something like 300Mbps. > > > > > > > > David Smith > > > > MVN.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
