The expensive bit may not be that great of an argument.  We're already 
spending $$$ on other equipment to accomplish the same thing.

Add 3 or 4 standard 115V outlets (to power switches and routers - 
non-PoE devices) and the rest should be PoE.  All remotely controlled 
off & on, all with individual ping watchdogs.

Make it a 2U, would likely have to.

On 2/28/2011 1:44 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/28/2011 09:52 AM, Brad Belton wrote:
>> And here I am thinking all this time that I was the only one who would
>> appreciate a device like this!  I spoke with someone at Streakwave a few
>> months ago about this and basically got a blank stare response.  He had no
>> idea why I would want such a thing..<sigh>
>>
>>
>>
>> So, to any manufacturers up to the task, here is (IMO) a starting point of a
>> bullet point list for the PoE device I'm envisioning:
>>
>>
>>
>> (1)  Multi-port models.  (e.g. 6, 12&  24 ports)
> Of course.
>
>> (2)  SNMP&  Web Interface Management with ACL firewall.
> Explain more? What do you want to query via SNMP? Write via SNMP? Why
> does it need an ACL system? Why not just use your existing network
> security system to keep people out? You do have a dedicated
> infrastructure management network right?
>
>> (3)  Redundant power supplies with separate power cords.  (e.g. UPS "Blue"&
>> UPS "Red")
> Of course. How much power would need to come in? Would the power
> supplies be hot swappable?
>
>> (4)  Dip switch DC polarity selectable per port.  (e.g. Trango/Canopy vs.
>> UBNT, etc.)
>
>> (5)  Dip switch 12VDC, 24VDC, 48VDC passive and standard 802.3af selectable
>> per port.
>
> Hmmm. Why not just do this via software interface (like cisco poe switch
> for example). That would make the most sense to me.
>
>> (6)  1U shallow depth form factor.
> Naturally
>
>> (7)  Auto-Ping per port.
> What does this mean? Is this like an iboot where if it doesn't receive a
> heartbeat in specified time period it cycles power on the port? Of
> course you would be able to disable this when doing maintenance that is
> a longer outage (like say flashing firmware or something)
>
>> (8)  LED Status indicators per port.
> Why? Just give it via SNMP/web interface. (Guess I'm just so used to
> being a remote support person that I never expect to have local access.
> Have managed 10s of thousands of remote systems that I never saw).
>
>> (9)  Optional DC power source model for solar sites?
> DC power is a requirement I think. On every model.
>
>> (10)  Optional Trango Apex/Orion GigE model?
> Don't know what this is. Maybe others on the list will?
>
>> What else would be beneficial in the design of this PoE controller?
> Think you about covered it.
>
> One thinks Cisco would do something like this and make it fairly
> dumb/cheap. They already meet all your above requirements (well don't
> know about redundant power supply on 1U but I imagine that could easily
> be done).
>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Mark Nash
>> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 10:53 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] non-802.3 rackmount poe switch
>>
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNbBdHAAoJEMvvG/TyLEAtz2UP/1UBbIBjHfM7T5Z0tzO2GtJY
> 27ztWSH8X826ii+0Q7msSBJxASHFP3wlQFQKP1KiHy/W4GxhJDXeFnFiZKeV+IFp
> GKsID3Xn7Og83ttVIMRKzX8DMhLwc31GoPkeEh7qix/a1JUACHgH9P9yZSOKCCmZ
> wD1msdvgop07Q6USTMiiMxe0OCbzzkQbIc0ERmdNjclvlZkJ0Ya0feLeEeag5LoQ
> 53wolRkpY6MA0lt0VH+3wXb1/mbQxklL9ezKDhmn9s/wwte8CqCL795aBfkVI4Z/
> oZuw+00FI5gJGQpQti04MoO0lou6N1N7MEVsFMc6f895rscGXNmjViWTX6QKgplL
> a7ncy9dQpbc7XQOJSUrSHn5S4O3K/vgpnJ+pK+3TiPTd9YVhOOGUIMA3vwz5BeQ/
> gGi8mWrtvaffAeEptQObfx1yf29Vk8qJbpwpXGo1eY+sE4rqeuBeYzPt06lyuSyc
> fU27hnc52xYulcTVeHXGPFBw+a97m+xbw6Rd7wqHTXEs8WWTFErUQ5+zQdYIMilG
> u8v95euKSPT7zicvIZubxjLgPwWTQIgSc2/kFkxDW5Z5j3l/JM/7MW72h8WfVN4w
> AjhVTJbP75VpkazJeLTfsBH8mdGyE21yY8fi35u7U9yh1jyy+OSvOtoeUfssG8CC
> 8587g27Ezu02NaT2E1cJ
> =r5jL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to